Stock Markets July 27, 2026 04:20 PM

Judge Allows Danone’s Trademark Lawsuit Against Chobani to Proceed Over Cold-Brew Packaging

Federal court finds plausible claims that Chobani’s La Colombe packaging and slogan could cause consumer confusion with Danone’s SToK brand

By Hana Yamamoto
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn

A Manhattan federal judge has denied Chobani’s motion to dismiss a trademark lawsuit filed by Danone, concluding that the French yogurt maker plausibly alleged Chobani copied the yellow-and-black packaging and the slogan "Bright & Mellow" used on Danone’s SToK ready-to-drink cold brew. The suit seeks unspecified damages and changes to prevent confusion; the decision does not resolve the ultimate merits of the case.

Judge Allows Danone’s Trademark Lawsuit Against Chobani to Proceed Over Cold-Brew Packaging
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • A Manhattan federal judge refused to dismiss Danone’s trademark lawsuit against Chobani over alleged copying of SToK coffee’s yellow-and-black packaging and the "Bright & Mellow" slogan.
  • The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages and injunction-type changes to avoid consumer confusion; the judge allowed the case to proceed without ruling on the ultimate merits.
  • This litigation is part of at least four legal disputes between Danone and Chobani since 2016, affecting consumer staples segments including yogurt and ready-to-drink coffee.

A federal judge in Manhattan declined on Monday to throw out a trademark lawsuit brought by Danone, the parent company of rival U.S. yogurt brand Dannon, against Chobani. The dispute centers on allegations that Chobani’s use of a yellow-and-black color scheme and the slogan "Bright & Mellow" for La Colombe cold-brew products risks confusing consumers with Danone’s SToK coffee line.

U.S. District Judge Jennifer Rochon said Danone sufficiently pleaded that Chobani’s packaging and tagline could lead to consumer confusion. Rochon rejected Chobani’s contention that the phrase "Bright & Mellow" was ineligible for trademark protection because it is generic or merely descriptive of coffee’s mouthfeel or taste.

Without deciding the ultimate merits of the infringement claim, the judge also found Danone’s allegations that Chobani copied SToK’s look to be enough to "support a plausible inference of bad faith." The ruling allows Danone’s suit to move forward; the complaint requests unspecified monetary damages and seeks changes to Chobani’s packaging and branding to avoid confusion with the "Bright & Mellow" mark.

The case is the latest legal clash in a broader, ongoing rivalry between the two companies. It is one of at least four lawsuits filed between Danone and Chobani since 2016, both firms being among the largest sellers of Greek-style yogurt in the U.S.

Chobani and its attorneys did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Danone and its lawyers also did not immediately reply to similar requests, according to filings.

Previously, Chobani had accused Danone of bringing an "opportunistic" suit intended to "weaponize trademark law against a superior competitor." That contention appeared in filings challenging Danone’s allegations.

In a separate but related strand of litigation noted in court papers, Danone last month sued Chobani over alleged inflation of protein claims on multi-serving tubs of Chobani 20G Protein, asserting those claims made the product appear more protein-rich than Danone’s Oikos Pro. In a subsequent interview, Chobani founder and Chief Executive Hamdi Ulukaya criticized Danone’s actions, saying the company was "throwing things out there" to generate damaging headlines and adding, "We never add external protein to our products," and, "We will never mislead anybody."

Corporate details cited in filings indicate Chobani is based in New York and acquired La Colombe for $900 million in December 2023. Danone is headquartered in Paris, and its U.S. subsidiary is located in White Plains, New York.


Context and next steps

Judge Rochon’s decision to deny dismissal means discovery and further litigation can proceed. The court did not make any findings on whether Chobani actually infringed Danone’s trademark rights; rather, the ruling found Danone’s factual allegations sufficient to allow the case to advance past the motion to dismiss stage.

Risks

  • Ongoing legal uncertainty - The case will proceed to later litigation stages, creating continued legal and financial uncertainty for both companies, which could affect the consumer staples and beverages sectors.
  • Brand confusion and marketplace friction - Allegations of packaging and slogan similarity raise risks around consumer misperception in retail shelving and marketing, a concern for packaged beverage and coffee sellers.
  • Reputational and commercial disputes - Repeated litigation between major brands can contribute to headline risk and potential shifts in competitive dynamics within yogurt and ready-to-drink coffee categories.

More from Stock Markets

Central Asian State-Owned Infrastructure Groups Eye Hong Kong Listings, Finance Chief Says Sep 6, 2026 MOEX Russia finishes flat as individual stocks diverge at Saturday close Sep 5, 2026 Citi: European TTF May Be Pricing in Too Much Winter and Hormuz Risk Sep 5, 2026 Geneva Delegates Agree Non-Binding Text on Autonomous Weapons After Lengthy Talks Sep 5, 2026 Goldman Raises MSCI Asia Pacific Target, Citing Tech Earnings Strength Sep 5, 2026