Stock Markets June 16, 2026 09:24 AM

U.S. Senators Ask NHTSA to Probe Tesla’s FSD Safety Figures After Investigation

Senators Markey and Blumenthal request regulator review and stronger reporting rules following findings that Tesla overstated safety claims

By Priya Menon
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn
TSLA

Two Democratic senators have asked the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to review the crash statistics Tesla publishes for its Full Self-Driving (FSD) driver-assistance system. The request follows a Reuters investigation that concluded Tesla exaggerated its safety claims by using inconsistent comparisons and selective crash metrics. The senators seek responses to specific questions by July 7 and urged tighter reporting requirements for companies deploying advanced driver-assistance or self-driving technology.

U.S. Senators Ask NHTSA to Probe Tesla’s FSD Safety Figures After Investigation
TSLA
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • Two Democratic senators, Edward Markey and Richard Blumenthal, requested NHTSA review Tesla's self-published FSD crash statistics and respond by July 7.
  • The letter cites a Reuters investigation that found Tesla's safety claims exaggerated by comparing FSD-triggered airbag-deployment crash rates to broad U.S. crash rates and to an older average vehicle fleet.
  • Senators urged NHTSA to strengthen reporting requirements for firms using self-driving or advanced driver-assistance systems; both Tesla and NHTSA did not comment.

Two Democratic members of the U.S. Senate have formally asked the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to scrutinize the crash statistics Tesla posts for its Full Self-Driving (FSD) system, citing concerns raised by an independent news investigation.

Senators Edward Markey of Massachusetts and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut sent a letter to NHTSA on Monday, pointing to a Reuters examination published last month. The senators described the calculations behind Tesla's FSD safety claims as "weak and misleading" and warned that the discrepancies create "an urgent safety problem."

In the letter, the senators requested that NHTSA reply by July 7 to a series of questions, including whether the agency has assessed Tesla's public statements about FSD safety and whether it has requested the underlying crash data Tesla used to produce those statistics. The letter also called on NHTSA to bolster reporting requirements for companies that deploy self-driving technology or advanced driver-assistance systems such as FSD, saying the agency currently lacks a mechanism to verify whether "public safety claims bear any relationship to reality."

Tesla and NHTSA did not respond to requests for comment.

The Reuters review concluded that Tesla executives, including the company CEO, have increasingly cited data over the past year asserting that FSD-equipped vehicles are as much as 10 times safer than human drivers. Researchers interviewed for that review told Reuters that Tesla's presentation of safety performance is overstated because the company compares a narrowly defined crash rate - crashes in which FSD-piloted Teslas experienced airbag deployments - to a broad U.S. crash rate that encompasses many less severe incidents.

The company also compares its vehicles to the average U.S. vehicle, which tends to be older than the typical Tesla on the road. According to the analysis cited by the senators, that comparison can skew results because newer cars increasingly incorporate safety features that reduce crash frequency and severity. The Reuters reporting further stated that Tesla has used the elevated safety figures in communications with European regulators as it seeks approval for FSD in the EU.

The senators' letter requests detailed information from NHTSA about whether the agency has evaluated the methodology behind Tesla's claims and whether regulators have sought the raw crash data supporting Tesla's published rates. It also presses the agency to consider stronger disclosure or reporting standards for companies offering advanced driver-assistance systems or autonomous driving features.


Context and next steps

The request from Senators Markey and Blumenthal sets a clear deadline for NHTSA to respond and signals congressional scrutiny of how automakers describe the real-world safety performance of automated driving systems. The letter seeks to establish whether existing oversight is sufficient to ensure that public safety claims are based on transparent, comparable data.

Risks

  • Regulatory scrutiny - Increased review by NHTSA and potential tighter reporting standards could affect manufacturers and suppliers in the automotive and ADAS/autonomy sectors.
  • Data transparency - Lack of access to underlying crash data raises uncertainty about the accuracy of public safety claims, impacting investor and consumer confidence in companies marketing advanced driving features.
  • Approval delays - Use of contested safety statistics in regulatory submissions, including to European authorities, could complicate or slow approval processes for FSD-type systems.

More from Stock Markets

Google Pledges $1.5 Billion to Expand Alabama Data Center Operations Jun 16, 2026 Market movers: SpaceX and Western Digital lead gains as Alibaba and Palantir slip Jun 16, 2026 Netflix Falls After Losing Roku Bidding Contest to Fox in $22 Billion Deal Jun 16, 2026 Gildan Shares Drop After Short Seller Alleges Inventory and Growth Issues Jun 16, 2026 Citi: U.S. positioning widens but Nasdaq remains a concentrated risk Jun 16, 2026