Commodities April 27, 2026 01:48 AM

Carney says Trump has not raised idea of Canada paying an 'entry fee' ahead of USMCA review

Ottawa presses for comprehensive talks as deadline and tariff tensions complicate trilateral review

By Nina Shah
Carney says Trump has not raised idea of Canada paying an 'entry fee' ahead of USMCA review

Canadian officials, including Prime Minister Mark Carney, say U.S. President Donald Trump has not used the phrase 'entry fee' in relation to the scheduled review of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. Ottawa warns the review is unlikely to conclude by the July 1 deadline and insists outstanding issues be resolved together rather than through piecemeal concessions amid continued tensions over U.S. tariffs on Canadian imports.

Key Points

  • Prime Minister Mark Carney says President Trump has not used the phrase 'entry fee' regarding the USMCA review.
  • Canada sees little chance of the review being finished by the July 1 deadline and prefers resolving all issues at once rather than piecemeal.
  • The dispute is tied to tensions over U.S. tariffs on key Canadian imports imposed last year, and Washington has outlined concessions it wants from Canada.

OTTAWA, April 23 - U.S. President Donald Trump has not raised the idea that Canada must pay an "entry fee" before a scheduled review of the United States-Mexico-Canada trade deal can begin, Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Thursday.

The three countries are expected to complete the review by July 1, but the timeline has been complicated by tensions between Washington and Ottawa over tariffs that the president imposed on key imports from Canada last year. The United States has already set out a number of concessions it wants Canada to make now - an approach some domestic commentators and media have equated with demanding an entry fee to the review.

Carney pushed back on that framing in comments to reporters. "I don’t know where the talk of an entry fee is from. It’s certainly not coming from me, it’s not language I’ve ever used, and it’s not language I’ve ever heard from the president of the United States," he said.

He emphasised that Canada would not be passively accepting instructions. "We’re not sitting here taking notes and taking instruction from the United States... we’re ready to go into detailed negotiations. We’re also ready to wait, if that’s what has to happen," Carney added, while saying he remained confident that progress could be achieved.

Officials in Ottawa say they see little likelihood of the review being completed by the July 1 deadline and stress a preference for addressing all outstanding points with the United States simultaneously rather than resolving matters in stages.

“We’re not going to make a series of concessions... just to get to a table and have a statement appear on a website in the United States (and) then receive a whole second list of things that they’re going to want," Dominic LeBlanc, the federal minister in charge of trade with the United States, told the Globe and Mail newspaper on Tuesday.

That stance underlines Ottawa’s concern about a sequential negotiating approach in which initial concessions could be followed by fresh demands. Canadian officials say they prefer a single, comprehensive negotiation to resolve outstanding differences with their U.S. counterpart.


The situation leaves the review timetable and the scope of discussions dependent on whether the parties agree to simultaneous resolution of issues or opt for phased concessions. For now, Canadian leaders publicly reject the notion that an "entry fee" has been proposed by the White House and signal readiness to negotiate in depth or to delay proceedings if necessary.

Risks

  • Delay risk - Canadian officials say there is little chance the review will be completed by the July 1 deadline, creating uncertainty for cross-border trade and planning.
  • Fragmented negotiation risk - Ottawa fears piecemeal concessions could lead to additional, subsequent demands, complicating comprehensive resolution of outstanding issues.
  • Bilateral tension risk - Ongoing tariff-related tensions between the United States and Canada could prolong negotiations and affect businesses that rely on cross-border supply chains.

More from Commodities

Goldman Lifts Long-Run Oil Price Outlook as Gulf Export Recovery Slows Apr 27, 2026 Gold Holds Narrow Range as Dollar Wavers Amid Iran Talks and Fed Focus Apr 27, 2026 U.S. and EU Cement Pact on Critical Minerals as Part of Wider Supply-Chain Strategy Apr 27, 2026 Goldman Raises Q4 2026 Oil Price Targets Citing Weaker Middle East Output Apr 27, 2026 Oil futures close mixed after volatile day; strong weekly gains on supply concerns Apr 26, 2026