World June 22, 2026 10:52 AM

A Dozen EU States Urge Bigger Modernisation Fund to Support Clean Transition

Twelve member countries ask European Commission to expand carbon market-backed fund as ETS overhaul looms

By Leila Farooq
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn

Twelve European Union member states have written to the European Commission asking for a substantial increase in the modernisation fund that channels revenues from carbon permit sales to help lower-income EU countries move away from fossil fuels. The appeal, contained in a letter dated June 19, arrives ahead of a planned revision of the EU emissions trading system set for July 15 and cites geopolitical and economic uncertainty as reasons to bolster predictable financing.

A Dozen EU States Urge Bigger Modernisation Fund to Support Clean Transition
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • Twelve EU countries asked the European Commission on June 19 to increase the modernisation fund, which is financed by carbon permit sales - impact on energy and public finance sectors.
  • The modernisation fund has disbursed over 20 billion euros since 2021, providing capital for fossil-fuel phase-out efforts in lower-income member states - impact on utilities and infrastructure investment.
  • The appeal coincides with an EU emissions trading system review scheduled for a July 15 proposal, where governments and industries have competing demands - impact on carbon markets and regulated industries.

Twelve EU member states have formally requested that the European Commission boost the size of the modernisation fund that aids less affluent member countries in their transition from fossil fuels, according to a June 19 letter sent to the Commission.

The countries named in the appeal are Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, Estonia, Greece, the Czech Republic, Croatia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia and Slovenia. The group is asking for an expansion of the fund, which is financed through revenues generated by sales of carbon market permits.

Since 2021 the modernisation fund has distributed in excess of 20 billion euros. The letter, cited in reporting on the request, framed the call for more resources in the context of broader political and economic uncertainty across the region.

"In the current political and economic context, characterised by increased geopolitical risks and uncertainty, predictable financing mechanisms remain an essential condition for the success of the energy transition in the EU," the letter said. "We call for a significant increase in the scale of financing, aligned with the growing challenges of the transition."

The appeal reaches the Commission at a sensitive moment: the European Commission is preparing a revision of the EU emissions trading system (ETS), with a formal proposal scheduled for release on July 15. The Commission is being pressed by varied interests - including governments and industries - that have competing views on how the carbon trading scheme should be adjusted.

The planned review of the ETS seeks to update the carbon market for the period after 2030 and to align its mechanisms with the EU's climate target for 2040 - a goal described in the letter as a 90% reduction in emissions by that year.

The June 19 communication and the looming ETS proposal underscore a policy debate that links the availability of dedicated financing streams to the broader ambition and design of the EU carbon market. Member states pushing for an enlarged modernisation fund emphasize the need for stable, predictable support to carry out energy transition plans, while the Commission faces trade-offs as it weighs different stakeholders' priorities.


Summary

  • Twelve EU member states asked the European Commission on June 19 to enlarge the modernisation fund, funded by carbon permit revenues.
  • The fund has allocated more than 20 billion euros since 2021.
  • The request precedes a planned ETS revision proposal due on July 15 and aims to align financing with the EU's 2040 climate objective of a 90% emissions cut.

Risks

  • Competing demands on the Commission from governments and industries regarding ETS changes may complicate consensus on funding and design - affecting carbon market and industrial sectors.
  • Geopolitical and economic uncertainty cited in the letter could undermine predictability of financing for transition projects if not addressed - affecting energy and public investment planning.
  • If the scale of financing is not increased to match transition challenges, lower-income member states may face delays or shortfalls in implementing fossil-fuel phase-outs - impacting utilities, infrastructure, and regional development.

More from World

Rubio Visits UAE, Kuwait and Bahrain to Outline U.S. Iran Memorandum to Gulf Partners Jun 22, 2026 Supreme Court Reinstates 2017 Conviction in Etan Patz Case, Citing Federal Limits on Relief Jun 22, 2026 Gaza Residents Flee Overheating Tents to Polluted Shore as Water Supplies Fail Jun 22, 2026 De La Espriella Narrowly Wins Colombia’s Presidency as Vote Count Nears Completion Jun 22, 2026 Ceasefire in Lebanon Holds Largely but Fragility and Displacement Persist Jun 22, 2026