Commodities April 22, 2026 07:06 AM

Prolonged Iran Conflict Risks Turning Short-Term Gas Demand Losses into Structural Decline, Says Gas Forum Chief

Measures adopted by importers to cope with Middle East outages could harden into lasting fuel shifts if the crisis persists, warning the Gas Exporting Countries Forum

By Jordan Park
Prolonged Iran Conflict Risks Turning Short-Term Gas Demand Losses into Structural Decline, Says Gas Forum Chief

The head of the Gas Exporting Countries Forum cautioned that the temporary demand destruction for natural gas triggered by the Iran war could become structural if the conflict endures. Since the crisis began late in February, over 500 million barrels of crude and condensate have been removed from global markets, prompting some gas-importing countries to increase coal use and accelerate renewables deployment. African gas producers are not yet capitalizing on the resulting market openings, while North American suppliers are filling the gap in Europe and Asia.

Key Points

  • The Iran war has caused significant natural gas demand destruction; immediate responses by importers include increased coal use and faster renewables deployment, impacting gas-fired power demand and energy markets.
  • Over 500 million barrels of crude and condensate have been knocked out of the global market since late February, representing the largest recent energy supply disruption and introducing uncertainty into projected 2026 market balances.
  • African gas producers are not fully exploiting spare LNG and pipeline capacity, allowing North American suppliers to capture European and Asian market share; this affects upstream producers, LNG infrastructure utilisation, and regional trade flows.

PARIS, April 22 - The immediate drop in global natural gas demand linked to the Iran war risks becoming a permanent shift if the conflict continues, the secretary general of the Gas Exporting Countries Forum warned on Wednesday.

Philip Mshelbila, who leads the organisation representing about a dozen member states that together hold roughly 70% of the world's proven natural gas reserves, addressed delegates at the Invest in African Energy conference in Paris. He described current adjustments by gas-importing nations as short-term responses that could harden into lasting change.

"If the conflict ended today, the world would recover in six months to a year. But if it lasts six months, those knee-jerk changes we are seeing could become structural," Mshelbila said.


Mshelbila echoed data showing the scale of the disruption. Since the Middle East crisis began at the end of February, more than 500 million barrels of crude and condensate have been removed from the global market, according to Kpler figures. That loss has been described as the largest energy supply disruption of the modern era.

In response, countries that depend on Gulf supplies have increasingly turned to coal and have expedited plans to expand renewable generation. Those actions are now providing an alternative to gas that, if maintained, could lower long-term gas consumption.


Looking ahead to 2026, Mshelbila said the sector had been preparing for a turning point: a tight global gas market expected to swing into oversupply. The ongoing conflict, he said, has introduced uncertainty into that outlook.

"Clearly this conflict has done something to that, and it's not yet clear whether it's just a delay, or whether in fact that glut will ever come," he said.


Addressing an audience that included African energy ministers, Mshelbila said resource-rich countries on the continent were missing a commercial opening to replace supplies lost to Middle East outages and constrained shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

He noted that while some African nations have spare capacity in both liquefied natural gas and pipeline gas, most are not producing at full capacity. "If you look at the export pipelines to Europe, from Algeria or from Libya, not one of them is full," he said.

As a consequence of underutilised African upstream capacity, Mshelbila said North American producers are stepping into European and Asian markets. "Normally in a situation of crisis this is an opportunity: Fill it up! Seize the market! Unfortunately we are missing out, because we don't have the upstream molecules to fill the infrastructure," he added. "The reserves are there, but they are still in the ground."


The remarks framed three interlinked dynamics: major immediate supply losses tied to the Middle East crisis; demand-side shifts toward coal and renewables among importers; and a potential commercial opportunity for African producers that is not being realised because of constrained output. How these dynamics evolve will determine whether current demand destruction remains temporary or becomes structural.

Risks

  • If the conflict endures beyond several months, short-term fuel-switching by importers could become structural, reducing long-term demand for natural gas and affecting gas producers and exporters.
  • Underutilisation of African gas infrastructure and slow upstream production growth risks forfeiting market opportunities to competitors, increasing vulnerability of African energy sectors to lost export revenues.
  • Uncertainty over whether the expected transition from a tight market to oversupply in 2026 will occur creates risks for investment planning and pricing across the gas supply chain, including LNG projects, pipeline operators, and trading markets.

More from Commodities

Large, Timed Short Trades Hit Oil Market Minutes Before Trump Extends Ceasefire Apr 22, 2026 Iran Detains Two Container Vessels After Gunfire Near Strait of Hormuz Apr 22, 2026 Governments Mobilize a Patchwork of Measures to Shield Households from Soaring Energy Costs Apr 22, 2026 Asian Shipowners Likely to Reopen Hormuz Passage Ahead of Western Firms, Executives Say Apr 22, 2026 Ceasefire Extended, Markets Look Past the Strait as Tech Drives Sentiment Apr 22, 2026