Commodities September 3, 2026 08:01 AM

Jefferies Lifts Long-Term Uranium Price Forecast to $95 per Pound

Brokerage cites rising costs, execution risk and policy support for nuclear as drivers behind higher price needed to fund future supply

By Derek Hwang
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn

Jefferies has raised its long-term uranium price forecast from $70 to $95 per pound, arguing that higher production costs, capital intensity and execution risk mean current prices are insufficient to finance the new supply required. The brokerage expects primary production to peak at 243.4 million pounds in 2033, with China accounting for the bulk of reactor capacity growth, and warns that secondary supply could fall sharply unless enrichment dynamics change.

Jefferies Lifts Long-Term Uranium Price Forecast to $95 per Pound
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • Jefferies raised its long-term uranium price forecast to $95 per pound from $70, citing higher costs and execution risk.
  • Primary uranium production is forecast to peak at 243.4 million pounds in 2033, with China expected to drive 74% of reactor capacity growth and see its requirements more than double.
  • Developers representing about 20% of supply from 2026-2035 have not yet secured major contracts, increasing the pricing needed to bring projects to market.

Jefferies has increased its long-term uranium price outlook to $95 a pound, up from a prior forecast of $70, citing a combination of higher costs and execution risks that, in the bank's view, make prevailing prices inadequate to underpin the new production the market will need.

The brokerage highlighted continued policy support for nuclear power as a backdrop to the market dynamics. "Uranium continues to benefit from geopolitical support for Nuclear investment and growth," analyst Mitch Ryan wrote, adding that current incentive pricing has delivered sufficient supply for present needs but that incumbent producers are resisting lower-priced contracts.

Jefferies noted that developers representing roughly 20% of expected supply between 2026 and 2035 have not yet secured major offtake agreements. The firm said higher costs, greater capital intensity and elevated execution risk all push the price level required to bring new projects to fruition.

According to the note, unit costs for major producers have climbed substantially over the past five years, rising by between 83% and 184%. That increase in production costs is central to Jefferies' argument that a higher long-term price is necessary to finance replacement and incremental supply.

On a production outlook, Jefferies projects primary uranium output to reach 243.4 million pounds by 2033 before easing thereafter. Growth in reactor capacity is expected to be concentrated in China, which the brokerage says will drive 74% of reactor capacity expansion as its uranium requirements more than double.

The firm also anticipates a sharp decline in secondary supply as enrichment dynamics reverse. It flagged renewed access to Russian enrichment services as the principal downside risk to its supply outlook and pricing assumptions.

"Our revised US$95/lb forecast reflects the economics required to finance replacement supply," Ryan wrote.

On investment positioning, Jefferies recommended a balanced, portfolio-based approach. "We prefer a portfolio strategy that decouples individual execution risk while retaining leverage to current and future market dynamics," Ryan said.

The note also identified sector preferences, citing Paladin and NexGen as favored names that combine current production exposure with longer-dated development leverage. The brokerage included ticker movement context in its commentary, noting PDN up 1.35% and NXE up 2.32% alongside references to broader uranium benchmarks.


Market implications

Higher long-term price assumptions shift the economics for developers and investors across the nuclear fuel supply chain, with potential effects on mining companies, utilities securing fuel, and capital markets that finance project development.

Risks

  • Renewed access to Russian enrichment is identified as the principal downside risk to secondary supply and price forecasts - this affects utilities and fuel supply chains.
  • Execution risk and capital intensity for new projects could delay supply coming online, impacting mining companies and investors in project development.
  • Incumbent producers resisting lower-priced contracts could influence contract formation and short-term supply availability, affecting market liquidity and pricing dynamics.

More from Commodities

Piper Sandler Raises H2 2026 Brent Forecast to $90/b, Acknowledges Further Upside Risk Sep 3, 2026 U.N. Warns 'Supersized' El Niño Could Peak Into 2027, Raising Global Weather Risks Sep 3, 2026 European gas retreats as traders take profits after surge past conflict-era peaks Sep 3, 2026 Nepal to Rebuild Tens of Thousands of Homes as Search Continues for the Missing Sep 3, 2026 Oil Pares Gains as U.S.-Iran Military Exchanges Add Supply Uncertainty Sep 2, 2026