Stock Markets June 16, 2026 01:45 PM

Investor Seeks Court Order to Halt GameStop Shareholder Vote on $35 Billion CEO Pay Plan

Delaware suit alleges inadequate disclosures and procedural changes that could let insiders decide Ryan Cohen's multibillion-dollar award

By Maya Rios
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn
GME

A proposed class action filed in Delaware's Chancery Court asks a judge to block a July 7 shareholder vote on a $35 billion compensation arrangement for GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen until shareholders receive full and accurate disclosures. The complaint alleges the board altered voting procedures and issued a misleading proxy that could allow Cohen and other insiders to secure approval with minimal public investor support.

Investor Seeks Court Order to Halt GameStop Shareholder Vote on $35 Billion CEO Pay Plan
GME
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • A proposed class action filed in Delaware seeks to block a July 7 shareholder vote on a $35 billion pay package for GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen until the company provides fuller disclosures.
  • The complaint alleges GameStop's board changed vote procedures - including whether Cohen can vote his 9.3% stake and how abstentions are counted - and issued a proxy statement the plaintiff calls misleading.
  • If the package's targets are met - a $100 billion market capitalization and $10 billion in EBITDA - Cohen would be eligible for a $35 billion payout; the suit contends insiders could secure approval with limited public investor support.

Overview

An investor in GameStop Corp. filed a lawsuit on Monday seeking to prevent shareholders from voting on a proposed $35 billion compensation package for Chief Executive Officer Ryan Cohen until the company provides what the complaint describes as proper disclosures. The filing, lodged in Delaware's Chancery Court, contends that the company has not been transparent about changes to the voting process tied to the pay proposal. The filing was reported on Tuesday by Bloomberg.

Allegations in the complaint

The proposed class action challenges the board's decision to grant Cohen stock option awards that, if certain ambitious targets are met, could yield a multibillion-dollar payout. Shareholders are scheduled to vote on the compensation package on July 7.

The suit says the board repeatedly altered procedures governing the vote in the run-up to issuing a proxy statement that the plaintiff describes as misleading and designed to depress turnout among public investors. Specific changes cited in the complaint include fluctuations over whether Cohen can cast votes with his roughly 9.3% stake and how abstentions would be treated in the vote tally.

The complaint quotes the plaintiff's lawyers as saying, "GameStop's audacious attempts to reduce the power of its disinterested shareholders - in contrast to its prior public statements and in disregard of its Certificate of Incorporation - must stop." The filing adds, "Cohen may want $35 billion. That does not allow him and his board to disenfranchise stockholders and violate Delaware law along the way."

Terms of the proposed package and governance concerns

Under the proposal, Cohen would receive $35 billion if the company reaches a $100 billion market capitalization and attains $10 billion in EBITDA. The complaint asserts that the board first issued a press release indicating the vote would exclude Cohen's shares and be decided by "unaffiliated stockholders," and then later released a proxy statement that mischaracterized those prior statements.

The plaintiff argues these moves could let Cohen and other insiders determine the outcome with the backing of only about 15% support from public investors, effectively allowing a small portion of holders to carry the measure.

Background on Cohen's involvement

Cohen initially invested in GameStop in 2020, joined the board in 2021 and became chairman later that year. He assumed the CEO role in 2023 and is now the company's largest individual shareholder.

On the compensation plan, Cohen told CNBC that, "I obviously want to build something much larger, but I don't benefit unless shareholders benefit."


This article presents the allegations and claims made in the filed complaint and the cited comments. It does not resolve the underlying legal questions, which will be determined through the court process.

Risks

  • Legal uncertainty - The outcome of the Delaware Chancery Court action could delay or alter the shareholder vote and the proposed compensation terms, affecting governance and investor timelines.
  • Governance and shareholder influence - Alleged procedural changes and proxy disclosures could concentrate decision-making power among insiders, raising concerns for public investor representation in corporate governance.
  • Market perception - The dispute and questions around disclosures and voting procedures may affect investor sentiment toward GameStop shares and could influence trading, particularly among shareholders focused on governance.

More from Stock Markets

Tropical Disturbance Near Texas Coast Threatens Heavy Rain, Flooding and Energy Disruptions Jun 16, 2026 Options Activity in Northern Oil & Gas Surges to 3,687 Contracts Jun 16, 2026 Volkswagen Scales Back T‑Roc Cabrio Output at Osnabrueck, Site Faces Uncertain Future Jun 16, 2026 Volkswagen to Scale Back T‑roc Cabrio Output at Osnabrueck, Plant Future Unclear Jun 16, 2026 Framework for Iran Pact Includes $300 Billion Private Investment Vehicle, Source Says Jun 16, 2026