Economy September 11, 2026 11:11 AM

US Banking Regulators Outline New Principles for Third-Party Risk Management

Federal agencies propose non-binding, principles-based guidance and a companion community bank guide; comments open for review

By Caleb Monroe
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn

Federal banking regulators on Friday released a proposed, principles-based set of guidelines intended to help banks and credit unions align third-party risk management to the risks presented by individual vendor relationships. The Federal Reserve, OCC, FDIC and NCUA said the guidance is non-binding and would replace existing third-party risk guidance once finalized. The agencies also issued a related statement about community banks' interactions with core service providers, and the Federal Reserve separately circulated a companion guide for Reserve-supervised community banks. Comments on the proposal are due 60 days after it appears in the Federal Register.

US Banking Regulators Outline New Principles for Third-Party Risk Management
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • Federal Reserve, OCC, FDIC and NCUA proposed principles-based guidance to help banks and credit unions tailor third-party risk management to individual vendor relationships - impacts banks and credit unions.
  • The guidance is non-binding; agencies intend to rescind existing third-party risk guidance once the new guidance is finalized - affects regulatory consistency and industry practices.
  • Agencies issued a statement on community banks' engagement with core service providers, and the Federal Reserve separately requested comment on a companion guide for Reserve-supervised community banks - targets community banking supervisory focus.

On Friday, four federal banking regulators unveiled a proposed framework aimed at reshaping how banks and credit unions manage risks tied to third-party relationships. The Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and the National Credit Union Administration said the proposed guidance is intended to help institutions "better align and tailor their third-party risk management practices to the risks of individual third-party relationships."

Officials described the proposal as principles-based and emphasized that, like other supervisory guidance, it is non-binding. The agencies signaled that after the proposal is finalized they plan to rescind existing third-party risk management guidance and replace it with the new, finalized document. The stated aims of that replacement are to promote greater consistency across the federal banking regulators and to support prudent innovation within the industry.

The agencies noted that stakeholders will have an opportunity to comment - written feedback is due within 60 days following publication of the proposal in the Federal Register. That comment period will inform the agencies before any final guidance is issued and before the existing guidance is withdrawn.


In a separate action, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued a statement focused on community banks and their engagement with core service providers. That statement outlines certain factors the agencies will consider when making supervisory and enforcement decisions that pertain to these core providers, reflecting targeted attention to how essential services are sourced and overseen by smaller institutions.

Additionally, the Federal Reserve Board released a request for comment on a proposed guide tailored specifically to Federal Reserve-supervised community banks. The Board said this companion document is intended to discuss the key risks faced by traditional community banking organizations in the context of their third-party relationships.

Together, the proposal, the agencies' statement on core providers, and the Fed's companion guide present a coordinated push to clarify supervisory expectations while allowing institutions to apply principles proportionally to the scale and complexity of individual third-party arrangements.

Risks

  • The guidance is non-binding, creating uncertainty about how individual institutions will interpret and implement the principles - relevant to banks, credit unions and their vendors.
  • Final content remains subject to change pending the 60-day public comment period after Federal Register publication, leaving the timing and specifics of replacement guidance uncertain - affects planning by financial institutions and core service providers.
  • Supervisory and enforcement considerations related to core service providers may introduce variability in oversight for community banks depending on how agencies apply the outlined factors - impacts community banks and service vendors.

More from Economy

Treasury's Enlarged Long-End Buyback Fails to Quell Bond Market Unease Sep 11, 2026 Hotter-than-expected CPI Reading Raises Odds of Fed Rate Increase Next Week Sep 11, 2026 Brazil's Inflation Eases More Than Forecast in August, Supporting Another Rate Cut Sep 11, 2026 Energy-driven inflation forces rethink for Bank of England as peers tighten Sep 11, 2026 U.S. Consumer Inflation Accelerates in August as Gas Prices Rebound Sep 11, 2026