World January 28, 2026

CBP Preliminary Review Does Not Report Alex Pretti Brandishing a Firearm

Internal assessment in Minneapolis shooting differs from early administration statements and aligns with video evidence

By Nina Shah
CBP Preliminary Review Does Not Report Alex Pretti Brandishing a Firearm

A preliminary internal review by U.S. Customs and Border Protection of the fatal shooting of 37-year-old Alex Pretti in Minneapolis does not state that he brandished a firearm. The assessment, compiled by CBP's Office of Professional Responsibility and shared with lawmakers, describes an encounter in which Pretti did not move from the street after an officer's order, was sprayed with pepper spray, and was shot by a Border Patrol agent and a customs officer following a struggle. Early statements from Trump administration officials characterized Pretti as an aggressor with a gun, remarks that video from the scene subsequently called into question and that were amplified by a senior White House aide.

Key Points

  • CBP's preliminary review, assembled by the Office of Professional Responsibility, does not report that Alex Pretti brandished a firearm; it is based on body-worn camera footage and agency documents.
  • Two federal officers - a Border Patrol agent and a customs officer - fired at Pretti after a struggle; a Border Patrol agent shouted that Pretti had a gun before the shots were fired.
  • Early statements from Trump administration officials described Pretti as an aggressor approaching officers with a 9 mm semi-automatic handgun, assertions that were contrasted by video from the scene. Sectors impacted include federal law enforcement, immigration enforcement operations, and public-sector healthcare due to the victim's role as an ICU nurse.

Overview

A preliminary internal review by U.S. Customs and Border Protection into the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti, 37, in Minneapolis does not record that he brandished a firearm, according to the document shared with lawmakers. The review was prepared by the agency's Office of Professional Responsibility and draws from body-worn camera footage and CBP documentation.

The assessment states that two federal officers - a Border Patrol agent and a customs officer - shot Pretti after he did not move out of the street following an order from a customs officer. It describes a sequence in which a customs officer attempted to move Pretti and a woman from the roadway; when they did not comply, the officer deployed pepper spray.


Sequence of events in the CBP review

The internal report says that CBP personnel then tried to take Pretti into custody and that a struggle ensued. During the struggle, a Border Patrol agent shouted multiple times, "He's got a gun!" Five seconds later, a Border Patrol agent and a customs officer fired at Pretti.

Footage captured on body-worn cameras is reported to show an agent removing a firearm from Pretti's waist prior to the shooting. The CBP review does not use the term "brandished," and it does not state that officers observed Pretti making an overt move with the weapon.


Contrasts with early administration statements

In the hours after the shooting, senior Trump administration officials described Pretti as an aggressor. The Department of Homeland Security said he "approached U.S. Border Patrol officers with a 9 mm semi-automatic handgun." That statement did not specify that the weapon was holstered.

White House aide Stephen Miller publicly labelled Pretti a "domestic terrorist" and a "would-be assassin" without offering evidence to support those characterizations. Video from the scene soon introduced details that undercut the initial public portrayals.


Context and remaining questions

The shooting has prompted nationwide reaction and led to a shift in tone by the President this week. Pretti, an ICU nurse at a veterans hospital, was killed on a Saturday; the incident has since drawn widespread attention.

The CBP review notes that customs officers typically operate at ports of entry screening travelers and goods, but some have been detailed to immigration enforcement tasks. The identities of the agents and officers involved at the scene have not been released, nor has the agency disclosed whether those personnel had prior experience with crowd control in urban environments.

Those details remain unanswered in the internal assessment shared with lawmakers. The review focuses on the footage and agency documentation as its evidentiary basis and does not make broader public claims beyond the recorded sequence of events.

Risks

  • Discrepancies between initial public statements and the footage-based internal review create uncertainty about official narratives, potentially affecting public trust in federal law enforcement - impact on government institutions and public safety policy.
  • Key information remains undisclosed, including the identities of the officers and whether they had relevant crowd control experience, leaving questions about training and operational deployment - impact on immigration enforcement agencies and oversight bodies.
  • Ongoing public uproar and political rhetoric around the incident could influence policy debates and agency communications, adding uncertainty for federal enforcement operations and administrative responses.

More from World

Kremlin says Russia has long offered to process or store Iran’s enriched uranium Feb 2, 2026 Long-Awaited Rafah Reopening Prompts Hope and Anxiety Among Palestinians Stranded Across Border Feb 2, 2026 Rafah Reopens but Core Questions Persist Over Implementation of Trump’s Gaza Blueprint Feb 2, 2026 Rafah Crossing Reopens on Foot with Strict Limits as Gaza Remains Under Strain Feb 2, 2026 Medvedev Warns World Is Growing More Dangerous but Says Russia Does Not Seek Global War Feb 2, 2026