Stock Markets February 2, 2026

U.S. Defense Contractors Shift Cash to Capital Spending After White House Pressure

Major firms plan markedly higher capex in 2026 as administration ties shareholder payouts to faster weapons deliveries

By Caleb Monroe LMT NOC LHX
U.S. Defense Contractors Shift Cash to Capital Spending After White House Pressure
LMT NOC LHX

Leading U.S. defense companies are redirecting capital toward investment in factories, supply chains and workforce as the White House signals limits on dividends and buybacks to accelerate weapons deliveries. After several years of muted reinvestment, five large contractors are forecast to boost capital expenditure by nearly 38% in 2026 versus 2025, driven in part by the administration's combination of production deals and pressure on shareholder payouts.

Key Points

  • Five major U.S. defense firms are projected to collectively spend $10.08 billion in capex in 2026, up about 38% from $7.31 billion in 2025.
  • The White House has combined multi-year production contracts with limits on dividends and buybacks to push faster weapons deliveries, an approach analysts describe as a 'carrot-and-stick' strategy.
  • Companies are redirecting funds previously earmarked for buybacks toward supply-chain resilience, workforce expansion, domestic manufacturing and internal investment; L3Harris plans to raise capex by more than 40% in 2026.

Major U.S. defense contractors are planning a material increase in capital expenditure in response to pressure from the White House to expedite weapons deliveries and curb shareholder payouts. Company disclosures and industry analysis indicate a clear shift away from buybacks toward reinvestment in production capacity and related areas.

Aggregate projections from Melius Research show that five large U.S. defense companies are expected to spend $10.08 billion in capital expenditures in 2026, a nearly 38% rise from $7.31 billion in 2025.

Analysts say the administration's approach, which pairs multi-year production commitments with restrictions on payouts, is prompting the change. "The Trump administration’s carrot-and-stick approach seems to be working," said Scott Mikus, an analyst at Melius Research. He described multi-year missile production deals as the carrot and the White House order linking executive pay and shareholder returns as the stick, creating incentives for contractors to expand capacity.

Industry advisers point to several specific uses for redirected capital. "Payout restrictions can be a forcing function for reinvestment, supply-chain financing and execution discipline," said Meghan Welch, managing director at BGL Aerospace and Defense Advisory. She said funds that previously might have gone to buybacks are likely to be rerouted toward strengthening supply chains, expanding the workforce, increasing domestic manufacturing and supporting internal investment.

Some companies have already signaled changes to their shareholder-return programs. Northrop Grumman said it would pause buybacks beyond January. L3Harris indicated it expects its share count in 2026 to remain broadly in line with 2025, a stance that suggests limited scope for repurchases. L3Harris also announced plans to increase capital expenditure by more than 40% in 2026.

Lockheed Martin said it was still evaluating its approach and declined to comment. Analysts interpret that stance as a potential tilt toward reinvestment. "While LMT did not make any direct comments on shareholder returns, we believe there is a clear lean towards capex and research and development," said Ken Herbert, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets. He added, "Our model now assumes no buybacks through 2028, but continued dividend payments."

The move toward higher capital spending marks a reversal from the slower capex growth seen since 2022, even as demand for arms has expanded amid rising geopolitical tensions. According to the compiled projections, defense firms expect capital reinvestments to rise by more than a third this year, reflecting a notable policy-driven shift in how cash is being allocated.


Impacted sectors: defense manufacturing, industrial suppliers, domestic manufacturing and labor markets tied to defense production.

Risks

  • Uncertainty around shareholder-return strategies - some firms have paused or limited buybacks, which may affect investor returns and market perceptions of the sector.
  • Execution and supply-chain risks - accelerated reinvestment aimed at expanding capacity requires effective supply-chain financing and operational discipline to translate spending into increased production.
  • Policy and program clarity - firms such as Lockheed Martin are still evaluating responses to the administration's guidance, creating near-term uncertainty about the scale and timing of capital reallocations.

More from Stock Markets

Elong Power Shares Collapse After Company Prices $7.6M Unit Offering Feb 2, 2026 Pfizer Inches Higher as Investors Await Quarterly Results Feb 2, 2026 SenesTech Shares Climb After New Zealand Clears Evolve Fertility Control Feb 2, 2026 Cboe Weighs Regulated 'All-or-None' Options Product to Rival Prediction Markets Feb 2, 2026 Broad Market Movers: Disney, Micron and a Wide Swath of Names See Volatility on Monday Feb 2, 2026