Stock Markets January 28, 2026

House Republican Probes Ford’s Use of Chinese-Licensed Battery Tech for U.S. Facilities

Representative questions whether licensing terms were altered as Ford shifts U.S. plants to produce LFP cells and grid-scale storage systems

By Sofia Navarro
House Republican Probes Ford’s Use of Chinese-Licensed Battery Tech for U.S. Facilities

A Republican chair of a U.S. House committee has asked Ford to clarify its agreement with China’s CATL after the automaker announced plans to repurpose U.S. battery manufacturing facilities to produce lithium iron phosphate cells and grid-scale energy storage systems using CATL-licensed technology. The lawmaker requested detailed answers from CEO Jim Farley about whether the original licensing terms have been changed to support new markets including energy storage and data centers.

Key Points

  • A Republican chair of a U.S. House committee is probing Ford’s arrangement with China’s CATL regarding licensed battery technology.
  • Representative John Moolenaar asked CEO Jim Farley whether the original licensing terms were updated or expanded to support energy storage and data center markets.
  • The inquiry focuses on Ford’s decision to repurpose existing U.S. battery manufacturing facilities to produce LFP cells and grid-scale energy storage systems - sectors affecting automotive manufacturing and energy infrastructure.

The Republican chair of a U.S. House committee has opened an inquiry into Ford Motor Co.'s plans to convert existing U.S. battery manufacturing capacity to produce lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cells and grid-scale energy storage systems under a licensing arrangement with China’s Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited (CATL).

In a letter addressed to Ford Chief Executive Jim Farley, Representative John Moolenaar raised concerns about the revised direction of the automaker’s battery strategy. He asked whether the original licensing agreement with CATL has been modified in any way to support Ford’s new emphasis on energy storage systems and data center markets.

"Ford’s revised business plan raises important questions about whether the original licensing terms have been updated, expanded, or otherwise altered to accommodate the company’s new focus on energy storage systems and data center markets," Moolenaar wrote.

The congressman has requested that Ford provide responses to a series of questions about its arrangement with CATL. The scope of the inquiry centers on the company’s decision to repurpose U.S.-based battery manufacturing facilities for the production of these specialized battery cells intended for both grid-scale storage and related applications.

The letter seeks clarity on the terms and possible changes related to the technology license and how those terms align with Ford’s updated manufacturing plans. The inquiry is specifically aimed at the contractual relationship with the foreign licensor and the conversion of domestic manufacturing capacity for the new cell chemistry and storage system production.

Beyond the questions posed in the letter, the materials provided to Ford and the exact content of the requested responses have not been disclosed in the inquiry note. The focus, as stated by the committee chair, remains on licensing details and the use of U.S. production assets to manufacture the LFP cells and grid-scale storage products under the CATL-licensed technology.


Summary: A Republican House committee chair has asked Ford for detailed information about its licensing deal with China’s CATL after Ford said it would repurpose U.S. battery plants to make LFP cells and grid-scale energy storage systems. The lawmaker’s letter questions whether the original licensing terms were altered to enable Ford’s new market focus.

Risks

  • Regulatory and oversight scrutiny - The congressional inquiry could lead to additional oversight or requests for documentation concerning licensing arrangements and use of domestic manufacturing capacity, affecting the automotive and manufacturing sectors.
  • Unclear licensing terms - Questions about whether original licensing terms were modified create uncertainty for stakeholders relying on the contractual structure of technology transfers, with implications for energy storage and data center supply chains.
  • Operational shifts in manufacturing - The repurposing of U.S. battery facilities for new cell chemistries and grid-scale products introduces execution risk for Ford and related suppliers in the automotive and energy infrastructure markets.

More from Stock Markets

Indian equities rally after U.S. agrees tariff reductions in trade accord Feb 2, 2026 SiTime Nears Acquisition of Renesas Timing Business in Potential $3 Billion Deal Feb 2, 2026 Tesla Debuts New All-Wheel Drive Model Y Trim in U.S.; Premium Option Also Launched Feb 2, 2026 Eastroc Beverage Shares Start Trading in Hong Kong at Offer Price After $1.3 Billion IPO Feb 2, 2026 SoftBank unit and Intel to jointly develop 'Z-Angle' memory technology Feb 2, 2026