Stock Markets January 26, 2026

Google Agrees to $68 Million Settlement Over Alleged Assistant Eavesdropping

Preliminary class settlement filed in San Jose would require federal judge approval and covers devices and false activations since 2016

By Leila Farooq GOOGL
Google Agrees to $68 Million Settlement Over Alleged Assistant Eavesdropping
GOOGL

Google has reached a proposed $68 million settlement in a class action that accused its Google Assistant of improperly recording and sharing private conversations after misinterpreting wake words. The agreement, filed in federal court in San Jose, awaits approval by U.S. District Judge Beth Labson Freeman and applies to people who bought Google devices or experienced so-called false accepts since May 18, 2016.

Key Points

  • Google filed a preliminary $68 million settlement in a San Jose federal court to address claims that Google Assistant improperly recorded private conversations after mishearing wake words.
  • The settlement applies to people who bought Google devices or experienced "false accepts" since May 18, 2016, and awaits approval by U.S. District Judge Beth Labson Freeman.
  • Plaintiffs' attorneys may request up to one-third of the fund - about $22.7 million - for legal fees; the filing cites a comparable $95 million settlement reached by Apple in December 2024.

Google has agreed to a preliminary $68 million class action settlement tied to allegations that its voice-activated assistant inappropriately recorded and circulated private conversations after misfiring on users' speech. The settlement was filed late Friday in federal court in San Jose, California, and must be approved by U.S. District Judge Beth Labson Freeman.

Plaintiffs claimed that Google, a unit of Alphabet, illegally recorded private conversations and then used those recordings to deliver targeted advertising after Google Assistant was inadvertently triggered. Google Assistant is designed to begin listening when users speak specified wake words, such as "Hey Google" or "Okay Google." The suit centers on instances when the system misperceived other speech as those wake words - commonly referred to as "false accepts" - and then allegedly led to ad delivery that users objected to.

The proposed settlement would cover people who purchased Google devices or who were subjected to false accepts beginning May 18, 2016, according to court papers. Google has denied any wrongdoing, but the company agreed to the payment to avoid the risk, cost and uncertainty of continued litigation, court documents say. The Mountain View, California-based company declined to comment on Monday.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs may seek up to one-third of the settlement fund for fees - roughly $22.7 million - as allowed under the terms described in court filings. The case follows a prior, similar settlement involving another smartphone maker: Apple reached a $95 million settlement with smartphone users in December 2024 over related allegations.

The filing in San Jose represents a resolution of claims tied to how a widely deployed digital assistant interprets spoken commands and how those interpretations can affect users' privacy and advertising experiences. The court's eventual decision on whether to approve the settlement will determine how the fund is distributed and whether any additional oversight or remedial measures are imposed as part of the resolution.

The legal papers and the settlement outline the parties' positions: plaintiffs allege improper recording and dissemination of private speech after misactivation, while Google denies the allegations and frames the settlement as a means to avoid protracted litigation.


Context note: The settlement filing, the potential legal fees, the covered time period beginning May 18, 2016, and the comparison to a December 2024 settlement for Apple are drawn from court filings referenced in the case documents.

Risks

  • Uncertainty over court approval - the settlement is preliminary and requires U.S. District Judge Beth Labson Freeman's approval, which could alter or block the proposed resolution (affects legal and technology sectors).
  • Potential legal costs and fee awards - plaintiffs' lawyers may seek up to one-third of the fund, which would reduce the amount available to class members and influence net financial impacts for the defendant (affects legal and corporate financial planning in the tech sector).
  • Ongoing reputational and regulatory exposure - while Google denied wrongdoing and settled to avoid litigation risk, the underlying allegations about voice-activated assistants and user privacy remain a concern for consumer trust and advertising practices (affects technology, advertising and privacy oversight).

More from Stock Markets

Federal Judge Blocks Attempt to End Temporary Protected Status for Haitians Feb 2, 2026 Google Cloud and Liberty Global Agree Five-Year Deal to Roll Out Gemini AI Across Europe Feb 2, 2026 Altman Says OpenAI Wants to Stay a Major Nvidia Customer Amid Chips Dispute Feb 2, 2026 Moody's Raises Twilio to Ba1, Cites Growth Trajectory and Conservative Financial Discipline Feb 2, 2026 Moody's Raises OUTFRONT Media Credit Rating to Ba3, Citing Lower Leverage and Digital Push Feb 2, 2026