Politics February 2, 2026

Trump Called FBI Agents After Georgia Election Office Search, New York Times Says

Report says a day after the Fulton County raid the president spoke to some agents by phone; White House defends coordination on election integrity

By Marcus Reed
Trump Called FBI Agents After Georgia Election Office Search, New York Times Says

The New York Times reported that President Donald Trump spoke by phone with several FBI agents a day after their search of a Fulton County, Georgia election office. The call followed a raid tied to an inquiry connected to Trump’s unproven claims about the 2020 election. A White House statement defended collaboration on election integrity priorities, while the FBI and Justice Department did not comment.

Key Points

  • President Trump spoke on speakerphone with some FBI agents a day after they searched a Fulton County, Georgia election office, according to a New York Times report citing three people.
  • The raid was linked to an inquiry into allegations of widespread voting fraud in the 2020 election, claims that courts, state governments and members of Trump’s former administration have rejected.
  • Official actors directly implicated include the FBI field office in Atlanta, the Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and the White House; the FBI declined to comment and the Justice Department did not immediately respond.

According to a New York Times report citing three people familiar with the matter, President Donald Trump spoke with certain FBI agents a day after federal agents executed a search at an election office in Fulton County, Georgia. The office, located outside Atlanta, had been the subject of that FBI action as part of an investigation tied to allegations of voting fraud advanced by the president after the 2020 election.

The New York Times account, as described by the three sources, says the president addressed the agents on speakerphone. During the exchange he asked questions and offered praise and thanks for their work on the inquiry.

The article also reports that the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, met with some of the same agents from the FBI field office in Atlanta the day after the search. During that meeting, Ms. Gabbard placed a call to the president from her cellphone, the report says, and the president spoke to the agents via speakerphone.

The search of the Fulton County facility was carried out in connection with allegations that the 2020 presidential result was affected by widespread voting fraud. Those claims have been rejected by courts, state governments and members of the president’s former administration, according to the reporting.

Critics have denounced the Georgia investigation as politically motivated. They contend that the Justice Department requires an unusual degree of independence because it is charged with administering justice without partisanship.

The report frames the raid as the latest instance in which the Trump administration has been accused of using the Justice Department against individuals the president perceives as opponents, or of intervening in cases where he believes he has been treated unfairly.

Responding to the reporting, White House spokesman Davis Ingle issued a statement saying, "DNI Gabbard and FBI Director (Kash) Patel are working together to implement the president’s election integrity priorities, and their work continues to serve him and the entire country well."

The FBI declined to comment on the report. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


Context and reporting limits

The details in this account follow the New York Times report and its three named sources. The agencies referenced in the reporting did not provide public comment to the media at the time of publication.

Risks

  • Perception of politicization of the Justice Department and federal law enforcement - this risk is raised by critics who view the Georgia investigation as politically motivated, and it directly implicates the Justice Department and FBI.
  • Erosion of public trust in non-partisan administration of justice - critics argue the Justice Department requires an unusual degree of independence because it is responsible for impartially administering justice.
  • Limited transparency from agencies - both the FBI and the Justice Department did not provide public comment in response to the report, creating uncertainty about official perspectives and facts.

More from Politics

Trump Says Closed Eyes in Cabinet Meeting Were From Boredom, Not Sleep Feb 2, 2026 Federal Judge Refuses to Halt DHS Immigration Operation in Minneapolis-St. Paul Feb 2, 2026 Judge Orders Release of Detained Father and Five-Year-Old; Family Returned to Minnesota, Lawmaker Says Feb 1, 2026 Democrat Flips Texas State Senate Seat, Prompting GOP Alarm Ahead of 2026 Feb 1, 2026 Chicago Mayor Orders Police to Probe Allegations of Illegal Conduct by Federal Immigration Agents Jan 31, 2026