Economy January 30, 2026

St. Louis Fed’s Musalem Says Policy Rate Is Neutral, No Further Cuts Warranted

Musalem signals current 3.50%-3.75% range is neutral as growth and policy tailwinds lessen need for added stimulus

By Leila Farooq
St. Louis Fed’s Musalem Says Policy Rate Is Neutral, No Further Cuts Warranted

St. Louis Federal Reserve President Alberto Musalem said the central bank does not need to lower interest rates further while the job market remains intact and inflation is above target but expected to ease. Speaking in prepared remarks for an event at the University of Arkansas, Musalem described the current 3.50%-3.75% policy range as neutral and cited economic growth, favorable credit conditions and supportive fiscal policy as reasons to avoid moving into more accommodative territory.

Key Points

  • The St. Louis Fed president views the current 3.50%-3.75% policy rate range as neutral, reducing the case for additional rate cuts absent deterioration in the job market or a substantial fall in inflation - impacts financial markets and banking sector interest-rate expectations.
  • Musalem expects inflation to move toward the Fed's 2% objective from roughly a percentage point above it, while noting risks that inflation could remain persistent - relevant for consumer-facing sectors and pricing strategies.
  • With the economy forecast to grow above trend and both credit conditions and fiscal policy acting as tailwinds, Musalem judged further monetary stimulus unnecessary at this time - significant for investors assessing cyclical exposure and fixed-income allocations.

WASHINGTON, Jan 30 - St. Louis Federal Reserve President Alberto Musalem said on Friday that the U.S. central bank need not pursue additional interest-rate cuts at this time, provided the labor market does not deteriorate and inflation does not fall precipitously. In prepared remarks for an appearance at the University of Arkansas, Musalem identified the current federal funds policy range of 3.50%-3.75% as neutral.

Musalem framed his view around the broader economic backdrop. He said the economy is poised to continue expanding above its trend pace and that, in that environment, further monetary easing is unnecessary when both credit conditions and fiscal policy are acting as "tailwinds."

"I see tailwinds supporting economic growth," Musalem said. "With inflation above target and the risks to the outlook evenly balanced, I believe it would be unadvisable to lower the rate into accommodative territory at this time."

On inflation, Musalem reiterated an expectation that it will come down toward the Fed's 2% objective from its current level, which he described as roughly a percentage point higher than that goal. Nonetheless, he cautioned that risks remain that inflation could persist.

He also noted an improved outlook for labor market stability, saying there is now less risk of a "substantial deterioration" in employment conditions. Taken together, these assessments underpin his conclusion that additional rate cuts are not warranted under prevailing circumstances.

The comments underscore a cautious posture: recognition of persistent inflation above target and a favorable growth picture that, in Musalem's view, make moving policy into an accommodative stance unwise unless material changes occur in inflation or labor-market dynamics.


Contextual takeaways

  • Policy range: Musalem identifies the current 3.50%-3.75% federal funds rate range as neutral.
  • Growth and support: He points to above-trend growth, supportive credit conditions and fiscal policy as reasons to avoid further easing.
  • Inflation and labor: He expects inflation to decline toward 2% from about a percentage point higher today but recognizes the risk it could persist; he also sees diminished risk of a major labor-market downturn.

Risks

  • Inflation could persist above the Fed's 2% target instead of declining as expected, creating upside pressure on prices - this would affect interest-rate sensitive sectors and real returns in fixed-income markets.
  • A potential deterioration in the job market would remove the main condition that Musalem cited for avoiding further rate cuts, introducing downside risks to consumption and labor-intensive industries.

More from Economy

Economists Say Warsh Nomination Unlikely to Shift Fed Policy This Year Feb 2, 2026 Pound Holds Near $1.37 Ahead of Bank of England Decision Feb 2, 2026 UK Manufacturing PMI Climbs to Highest Level Since August 2024 as New Orders Accelerate Feb 2, 2026 German Retail Sales Seen Rising 2% in 2026, Real Growth Near-Stagnant Feb 2, 2026 Warsh Signals Desire to Shrink Fed Balance Sheet — Practical Limits Make Rapid Change Unlikely Feb 2, 2026