Economy January 30, 2026

Patagonian blazes overwhelm protected forests as austerity cuts draw fire

Massive wildfires in Argentina’s south strain firefighting capacity and revive criticism of deep spending reductions under President Milei

By Maya Rios
Patagonian blazes overwhelm protected forests as austerity cuts draw fire

Widespread wildfires in Patagonia have scorched an area more than twice the size of Buenos Aires, breached the Los Alerces National Park and prompted a government emergency declaration in four southern provinces. Critics say steep budget cuts to wildfire prevention and response under President Javier Milei have weakened preparedness, while authorities move to free emergency funds and allocate roughly $69 million to firefighting.

Key Points

  • Wildfires in Patagonia have burned more than twice the area of Buenos Aires and have breached Los Alerces National Park, home to alerce trees more than 3,600 years old.
  • Chubut province reports over 110,000 acres (44,515 hectares) destroyed; the season’s burned area already tops last summer’s roughly 80,000 acres (32,374 hectares).
  • Critics link a significant fall in federal funding for wildfire prevention and response - including a 71% real-terms cut to the National Fire Management Service in the 2026 budget, per FARN - to reduced preparedness; the government has authorized an emergency declaration and allocated about $69 million to firefighting.

Patagonia is facing a severe wildfire season that has burned an area exceeding twice the size of Buenos Aires and reached protected forest inside Los Alerces National Park, authorities and environmental groups said.

The federal government announced it would declare an emergency in the southern provinces of Chubut, Rio Negro, Neuquen and La Pampa to unlock funding to confront the fires. Officials said the most intense blazes are concentrated in Chubut, where firefighters are contending with strong winds and high temperatures.

Provincial authorities in Chubut reported that more than 110,000 acres (44,515 hectares) have been destroyed so far. The first fires of the season were reported in December, and the current burned area already exceeds the roughly 80,000 acres (32,374 hectares) affected during last summer’s season, according to Greenpeace.

Environmental campaigners noted particular alarm that flames have breached Los Alerces National Park, a UNESCO World Heritage site known for its alerce trees. Those trees can live for more than 3,600 years and are considered the world’s second-longest-living tree species.

Critics of the government’s fiscal policy have linked the scale of the blazes and the difficulty of response to deep spending reductions enacted by President Javier Milei’s administration. Milei’s fiscal programme, described by some as aggressive tightening and labelled "chainsaw" spending cuts, has reduced budgets across multiple programs. Environmental groups and local non-profit organizations said the cuts significantly lowered funding for wildfire prevention and response.

One local non-profit, FARN, said Argentina’s 2026 budget slashed funding for the National Fire Management Service by 71% in real terms versus the previous year. Ariel Slipak, an economist at FARN, said: "These fires are absolutely predictable," and added that Milei’s government had prioritized a balanced budget over emergency funds "at all costs."

Argentina’s Ministry of Security announced it would allocate about $69 million to support firefighting efforts. The pledge came as environmentalists continued to criticize broader policy stances taken by the administration.

President Milei has drawn condemnation from activists for remarks dismissing climate change as a "socialist lie," and his government has said it is considering withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, following the example of U.S. President Donald Trump, a close ally of Milei, who exited the accord this year.

Hernan Giardini of Greenpeace in Argentina warned of the political cost of downplaying climate risk. "To continue denying or underestimating the effects of climate change, which science and the ecological movement have long warned about, is a political irresponsibility that will be paid for by forests and homes," he said.


Context and implications

The current fires have become a focal point for debate over public spending priorities and environmental policy. Officials have moved to free funds through an emergency declaration and a Ministry of Security allocation, while NGOs and provincial authorities cite sharply reduced federal resources for prevention and response as a compounding factor in the crisis.

Risks

  • Funding reductions for wildfire prevention and response could constrain firefighting capacity and preparedness - impacting public safety and natural resources management.
  • Ongoing strong winds and high temperatures in Chubut increase the difficulty of containing fires, potentially expanding burned areas and environmental damage.
  • Policy moves and rhetoric around climate change, including consideration of withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, add uncertainty to national environmental strategy and long-term planning.

More from Economy

Economists Say Warsh Nomination Unlikely to Shift Fed Policy This Year Feb 2, 2026 Pound Holds Near $1.37 Ahead of Bank of England Decision Feb 2, 2026 UK Manufacturing PMI Climbs to Highest Level Since August 2024 as New Orders Accelerate Feb 2, 2026 German Retail Sales Seen Rising 2% in 2026, Real Growth Near-Stagnant Feb 2, 2026 Warsh Signals Desire to Shrink Fed Balance Sheet — Practical Limits Make Rapid Change Unlikely Feb 2, 2026