Economy January 27, 2026

IMF: Removing Interprovincial Barriers Could Lift Canada’s GDP by Nearly 7%

Fund economists say cutting domestic frictions could add about C$210 billion to long-run output, with services liberalization delivering most gains

By Avery Klein
IMF: Removing Interprovincial Barriers Could Lift Canada’s GDP by Nearly 7%

An International Monetary Fund analysis finds that eliminating regulatory and administrative barriers between Canadian provinces could raise real GDP by almost 7%, equal to roughly C$210 billion in long-term output. The IMF highlights particularly large tariff-equivalent costs inside services such as healthcare and education, and says most gains would arise from liberalizing finance, telecommunications and transport. Success depends on better federal-provincial cooperation and mutual recognition of standards.

Key Points

  • Removing interprovincial regulatory and administrative barriers could raise Canada's real GDP by nearly 7%, equal to about C$210 billion in long-run output.
  • Internal trade frictions average a 9% tariff equivalent, with services such as healthcare and education facing barriers that can exceed a 40% tariff equivalent; finance, telecommunications and transport account for about four-fifths of projected gains.
  • Smaller provinces and northern territories would see the largest percentage gains, while the entire country stands to benefit from a more efficient allocation of capital and labor.

Overview

A new IMF assessment concludes that Canada could realize close to a 7% increase in real gross domestic product if the country dismantles the web of rules and restrictions that impede commerce across provincial borders. The report estimates those reforms would translate into a long-run boost of roughly C$210 billion to the national economy.

Internal frictions and their magnitude

The IMF team describes Canada's domestic market as fragmented, noting that this fragmentation creates impediments for goods, services and labor moving between provinces. On average, these barriers amount to an estimated 9% tariff equivalent on internal trade. The economists emphasize that this pattern reflects Canada's federal arrangement, saying, "Canada’s internal market has long reflected its federal structure, with provinces exercising constitutional authority over many of the policies that shape commerce."

Barriers are especially acute in service industries. The IMF points out that restrictions in sectors such as healthcare and education can surpass the equivalent of a 40% tariff - levels that would be considered extreme in typical international trade agreements but persist within Canada's domestic regulatory landscape.

Winners, sectors and sources of gains

While the report finds that all provinces would benefit from greater internal integration, it notes that smaller provinces and the northern territories stand to see the largest percentage gains. The IMF estimates that about four-fifths of the projected GDP improvement would come from liberalizing essential service sectors, specifically finance, telecommunications and transport.

The report frames internal liberalization as a national productivity opportunity rather than merely a redistribution, stating, "Internal integration is not a zero-sum reallocation, it is a national productivity dividend" that could help insulate Canada from external trade volatility, particularly developments in the United States.

Implementation challenges

Realizing the potential gains will, the IMF says, require improved modes of cooperative federalism. Practical steps highlighted include mutual recognition of standards and professional credentials so that capital and labor can flow more freely across provincial lines. The report concludes with a clear admonition: "The evidence is clear: internal barriers remain large, economically costly, and increasingly out of step with the needs of a modern, vibrant, service-intensive economy."

Implications for markets and policy

The IMF’s findings point to concentrated economic upside in service sectors and to a political and administrative agenda focused on intergovernmental coordination. Any movement toward harmonization of rules or mutual recognition would mainly affect finance, telecommunications and transport, and would likely alter the competitive landscape for firms operating across provincial borders.


Note: The analysis above reflects the findings and language presented in the IMF report and does not introduce new data or opinions beyond that source.

Risks

  • Achieving the projected gains depends on improved cooperative federalism and mutual recognition of standards and credentials; failure to secure provincial agreement would limit implementation.
  • Constitutional authority held by provinces over many policy areas presents legal and political constraints, making reform complex and potentially slow.
  • High protection in politically sensitive service sectors such as healthcare and education - where barriers can exceed a 40% tariff equivalent - suggests reform could face strong domestic resistance.

More from Economy

House Prepares Vote to End Brief Partial Shutdown, Final Ballot Expected Tuesday Feb 2, 2026 France’s 2026 Budget Clears Parliament After Concessions, Targets 5% Deficit Feb 2, 2026 Cboe Holds Early Talks to Bring Binary Options Back to Retail Traders Feb 2, 2026 Administration to Build $12 Billion Critical Minerals Reserve to Shield U.S. Manufacturing Feb 2, 2026 Investors Pile Into Gold and Miner ETFs in January as Safety Demand Rises Feb 2, 2026