Economy February 2, 2026

CIBC Sees Modest, Gradual Boost to Canada’s Growth from Government Spending

Report projects fiscal measures to lift GDP by roughly 0.5 percentage point by end of 2027, with timing dependent on project delivery and provincial restraint

By Hana Yamamoto
CIBC Sees Modest, Gradual Boost to Canada’s Growth from Government Spending

A CIBC analysis by economists Ali Jaffery and Avery Shenfeld finds that Canada’s fiscal stance will provide a measured lift to growth rather than a rapid acceleration. While federal outlays have grown materially as a share of GDP, provincial governments are exercising fiscal restraint. The report estimates a slowly building fiscal impulse that adds a few tenths to annualized real GDP growth in the near term and approaches about a half percentage point by late 2027 as capital projects begin to translate into activity.

Key Points

  • CIBC economists project fiscal measures will add a few tenths of a percentage point to annualized real GDP growth in the near term, rising to about 0.5 percentage point by end-2027 as capital projects take effect. - Impacted sectors: infrastructure, construction, engineering, materials.
  • Federal spending has increased from roughly 10% of GDP pre-pandemic to a projected 14%, while provinces are restraining deficits to hit fiscal targets, moderating the overall fiscal impulse. - Impacted sectors: public sector payrolls and government services.
  • A meaningful part of the projected lift comes from the government spending component (G), including civil service salaries and infrastructure; successful crowding-in of private investment could raise long-run potential output by around 0.25 percentage point. - Impacted sectors: private investment-dependent industries and capital goods.

Canada’s fiscal course is shifting toward a methodical, incremental contribution to economic activity, according to a new report authored by CIBC economists Ali Jaffery and Avery Shenfeld. The paper stresses that although Ottawa’s spending decisions attract public attention, provincial governments collectively represent a larger aggregate spending footprint and their discipline matters materially for the national fiscal impulse.

With further easing of interest rates appearing unlikely, the economists argue that any policy-driven boost to growth will arrive mainly through the delayed effects of earlier rate cuts and enacted fiscal measures. The authors emphasize the importance of scale when assessing economic impact - noting that understanding the magnitude and timing of the fiscal lift requires careful number-crunching.

Jaffery and Shenfeld’s calculations indicate the near-term contribution from fiscal measures - including multiplier effects - will initially amount to a few tenths of a percentage point added to the annualized real GDP growth rate in coming quarters. That contribution is expected to build over time and could reach roughly a half percentage point by the end of 2027 as capital spending projects ramp up.

The report highlights how federal spending has grown as a share of output, rising from about 10% of GDP before the pandemic to a projected 14% more recently. By contrast, provinces are generally working to curb deficits to meet their fiscal targets, which tempers the aggregate fiscal impulse relative to what a fully expansionary stance across all levels of government would deliver.

A substantial portion of the anticipated gain comes from the "G component" of GDP - direct government expenditures such as civil service compensation and public infrastructure work. The economists point out that if publicly funded projects successfully "crowd-in" private investment, the effect could lift Canada’s long-run potential output by around 0.25 percentage point.

However, the report underscores that the ultimate payoff hinges on execution - the timely delivery of capital projects and a regulatory environment that facilitates private participation. In their assessment, the stimulus is unlikely to produce a dramatic short-term turnaround; instead, it represents a meaningful, though measured, contribution to an economy currently expanding at a mid-1% pace.


Implications for markets and sectors

  • Infrastructure and construction activity stand to benefit as capital projects are implemented.
  • Public-sector compensation contributes to the government-spending component of GDP.
  • If projects attract private spending, broader equipment, engineering and materials sectors could see positive spillovers.

Risks

  • Delays or inefficiencies in executing capital projects could postpone or reduce the projected fiscal contribution, affecting construction and infrastructure-related industries.
  • Provincial fiscal restraint could blunt the scale and speed of the national fiscal impulse, limiting near-term effects across sectors reliant on public demand.
  • An unsupportive regulatory environment could impede private-sector participation in public initiatives, reducing potential crowd-in effects and moderating gains to long-run potential output.

More from Economy

Notepad++ Update Channel Compromised in Targeted Supply-Chain Intrusion Feb 2, 2026 Banks Anticipate a Pickup in Business Loan Demand in 2026, Fed Survey Finds Feb 2, 2026 OpenAI debuts Codex mobile app to compete in AI code-generation market Feb 2, 2026 Gold’s Bull Trend Intact After Historic Two-Day Drop Feb 2, 2026 SNB Chair Calls Low Inflation and 0% Rates a Challenge for Policy Feb 2, 2026