Economy June 18, 2026 06:21 AM

China Defends Controls on Critical Mineral Exports as G7 Seeks Supply Diversification

Beijing says its export control measures follow international practice while G7 moves to reduce dependence on single suppliers

By Sofia Navarro
Share
Twitter Reddit Facebook LinkedIn

China has defended recent measures to tighten export controls on critical minerals, saying the changes are consistent with international norms and aimed at safeguarding peace, stability and non-proliferation obligations. The comments followed G7 leaders' agreement to coordinate efforts to lessen reliance on any single outside supplier for rare earths and permanent magnets, with interim and ultimate concentration targets through 2030.

China Defends Controls on Critical Mineral Exports as G7 Seeks Supply Diversification
Summarize with
ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Grok Gemini

Key Points

  • China describes its export control measures as standardization aligned with international practice and tied to non-proliferation duties.
  • G7 leaders plan coordinated stockpiling and a bigger role for the International Energy Agency to cut dependence on any single external supplier of rare earths and permanent magnets.
  • Defense, technology and renewable energy sectors are highlighted as sectors impacted by supply concentration in critical minerals.

China reiterated on Thursday that its recent tightening of export rules for critical minerals is meant to align with international practices and to strengthen controls in a way that protects global peace and regional stability. Foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian framed the moves as part of an effort to standardize and improve the country's export control system, and to meet international non-proliferation responsibilities.

The remarks came after leaders of the Group of Seven reached a consensus on Wednesday to increase cooperation aimed at reducing their governments' reliance on a single external source of critical minerals. The G7 package of measures includes coordinating stockpiles and enlarging the International Energy Agency's role in managing supplies.

China urged the G7 to respect market economy principles and established international trade rules. Lin also called on the grouping to refrain from imposing what he described as the rules of small cliques that, in his view, undermine the international economic and trade order.

Western governments have stepped up efforts to diversify supplies of metals that the article identifies as essential to defense, technology and renewable energy sectors. Those efforts were prompted in part by export restrictions imposed by Beijing last year on permanent magnets, which the article says disrupted various industries and highlighted dependence on a single supplier.

Without explicitly naming China, G7 leaders stated they intend to reduce dependence on any one supplier outside their grouping and partner countries for rare earths and permanent magnets to below 60% by 2030, with an ultimate aim of achieving 50% as soon as possible.

The public exchange underscores a mounting focus by consumer nations on supply security for materials tied to defense capabilities, technological manufacturing and the energy transition. At the same time, China has defended its export measures as consistent with international norms and necessary to broader security and non-proliferation commitments.


Key points

  • China says its export control changes are meant to standardize and improve its system while meeting non-proliferation obligations.
  • G7 leaders agreed to coordinate stockpiling and expand the International Energy Agency's role to cut reliance on single suppliers of rare earths and permanent magnets.
  • Sectors cited as affected include defense, technology and renewable energy, given their dependence on the specified metals.

Risks and uncertainties

  • Export curbs can disrupt industries that rely on a concentrated supply chain for permanent magnets and rare earths, affecting manufacturing in technology and defense sectors.
  • Efforts to change sourcing and stockpiling may encounter practical and timeline uncertainties as G7 leaders set targets to reduce supplier concentration to under 60% by 2030 and ultimately to 50%.
  • There is potential for further tension between trading partners over the interpretation and application of export control rules and trade principles, as reflected by China's call to avoid rules imposed by small cliques.

Risks

  • Export restrictions can disrupt industries dependent on a concentrated supply chain for permanent magnets and rare earths, affecting manufacturing in technology and defense.
  • Targets to reduce reliance on a single supplier to below 60% by 2030 and ultimately to 50% carry implementation and timeline uncertainties.
  • Differences over trade rules and export control practices risk escalating tensions between major trading partners.

More from Economy

Norges Bank Keeps Deposit Rate at 4.25% and Signals Further Tightening Jun 18, 2026 G10 central banks respond to easing energy pressures as rate hikes continue Jun 18, 2026 Central Banks Move to Tighten Policy as Middle East Conflict Adds to Inflationary Pressure Jun 18, 2026 India's Thermal Coal Imports Reach Four-Year Low as Domestic Output and Renewables Rise Jun 18, 2026 Bank of England policymakers split but keep Bank Rate at 3.75% - minutes show caution over energy risks Jun 18, 2026