Concrete Pumping Holdings Q4 2025 Earnings Call - Steady Platform Amidst Market Challenges and Strategic Capex Acceleration

Conference Call Moderator: Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for participating in today’s conference call to discuss Concrete Pumping Holdings’ financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended October 31st, 2025. Joining us today are Concrete Pumping Holdings CEO Bruce Young, CFO Iain Humphries, and the company’s external director of investor relations, Cody Slach. Before we go further, I would like to turn the call over to Mr. Slach to read the company’s safe harbor statement within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that provides important cautions regarding forward-looking statements. Cody, please go ahead.

Cody Slach, External Director of Investor Relations, Concrete Pumping Holdings: Thank you. I’d like to remind everyone that during this call, to give you a better understanding of our operations, we will be making certain forward-looking statements regarding our business and outlook. These statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. For information concerning these risks and uncertainties, see Concrete Pumping Holdings’ annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly report on Form 10-Q, and other publicly available filings with the SEC. The company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events, or otherwise. On today’s call, we will also reference certain non-gap financial measures, including Adjusted EBITDA, net debt, and free cash flow, which we believe provide useful information for investors.

We provide further information about these Non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations of the comparable GAAP measures in our press release issued today or in the investor presentation posted on the company’s website. I’d like to remind everyone that this call will be available for replay later this evening. A webcast replay will also be available via the link provided in today’s press release, as well as on the company’s website. Additionally, we have posted an updated investor presentation to the company’s website. Now, I’d like to turn the call over to the CEO of Concrete Pumping Holdings, Bruce Young. Bruce?

Iain Humphries, CFO, Concrete Pumping Holdings: Thank you, Cody, and good afternoon, everyone. In the fourth quarter, our results continue to demonstrate the durability of our operating model and the benefit of our diversified platform despite a challenging macroeconomic backdrop. U.S. concrete pumping volumes in the fourth quarter remained stable in the commercial market, and the continued improvement in infrastructure was offset by lower home building volumes and softer residential construction markets. Our EcoPan waste management services segment again delivered steady year-over-year growth, underscoring the benefits of our diversified platform. In addition, our disciplined approach to cost management, fleet efficiency, and strategic pricing played an important role in managing top-line pressure and supporting profitability. Turning to specific comments by segment, within our U.S. pumping business, we continue to experience year-over-year improvement in publicly funded infrastructure work, including road, bridge, and education projects. Infrastructure projects were 24% of our U.S.

Concrete pumping revenue during fiscal 2025, and our national footprint remains an advantage as previously allocated federal and state funding moves into proactive project starts. In the commercial end market, which was 47% of our U.S. concrete pumping revenue, the demand environment in heavy commercial construction improved through the year in our key geographies, and this is underpinned by expansion in data center, chip plant, and large warehouse activity. Light commercial activity was softer year-over-year as construction volumes remained more sensitive to interest rate pressure and tariff-related uncertainty. Moving on to the residential end market, affordability constraints from higher interest rates continued to cause downward pressure on home building demand volumes, and year-over-year revenue was lower in this end market despite pricing being relatively stable.

Our residential end market mix was at 29% of total revenue on a trailing 12-month basis, and we expect that moderating mortgage rates will encourage a steady path towards normalization to address the structural supply-demand imbalance in housing. We expect this will support medium to long-term home building activity, and we believe the Federal Reserve’s path to interest rate reduction should provide incremental support to this end market’s growth over time. Moving to our U.K. operations, commercial construction activity remains subdued as elevated interest rates and economic uncertainty continue to weigh on volumes. However, infrastructure remains resilient in the U.K., particularly in energy projects and continued growth in HS2 rail construction, which still has a long construction runway remaining to project completion. In our U.S. concrete waste management business, we continue to increase revenue due to both organic volume and pricing growth, even as the broader U.S.

Construction markets remain challenged. Now, I’d like to pivot to 2026 and our capital investment plans, particularly surrounding an upcoming change with tighter emission standards that we believe will impact the broader construction industry. As a company focused on sustainable growth and long-term shareholder value, we are proactively accelerating a $22 million investment from fiscal 2027 into fiscal 2026 in our U.S. concrete pumping and EcoPan fleet in advance of the upcoming 2027 stricter NOx emission standards. For those of you who are unaware of what this means, NOx refers to nitrogen oxides, which are emissions produced by diesel engines and regulated due to their impact on air quality. The upcoming 2027 standards that are expected to go into effect January 1st, 2027, will significantly tighten allowable NOx emission levels for new heavy-duty equipment.

For fleet operators like Concrete Pumping Holdings, these standards affect the cost, design, reliability, and availability of new OEM equipment and will increasingly influence customer preferences on job site requirements. The decision to accelerate equipment purchases is based on a couple of key considerations, including navigating expected disruptions from first-generation truck technologies and anticipated truck price increases in 2027 driven by incremental OEM production costs. From an operational standpoint, we have experienced this change in emission regulations before, and transitioning heavy construction equipment to meet modern NOx emission standards is far more complex than simply replacing an engine or adding emissions hardware. These changes fundamentally alter how the equipment behaves in real-world conditions, and the last engine emissions change took several years to achieve an acceptable standard.

This pull forward of a significant portion of fiscal year 2027 investment will reduce replacement CapEx expenditures in fiscal year 2027 and aligns with our capital allocation roadmap to allow for a smooth transition under new regulations to improve the company’s competitive positioning. I will now let Iain address our financial results in more detail before I return to provide some concluding remarks. Iain?

Cody Slach, External Director of Investor Relations, Concrete Pumping Holdings: Thanks, Bruce, and good afternoon, everyone. Moving right into our fourth quarter results, revenue was $108.8 million compared to $111.5 million in the prior year quarter. This slight year-over-year decline reflects continued timing delays in commercial construction activity and softness in residential demand driven primarily by the prolonged high-interest rate environment. Revenue in our U.S. concrete pumping segment, mostly operating under the Brundage-Bone brand, was $72.2 million compared to $74.5 million in the prior year quarter. Looking at our end markets, infrastructure projects remained a bright spot, with demand supported by sustained federal and state investments. Commercial project volume was largely consistent with the prior year fourth quarter. Strength in heavy and complex commercial projects helped to offset softness in light commercial work that continues to feel the pressure from high interest rates.

Residential demand softened late in the fiscal year, consistent with the broader affordability challenges and the prolonged high-interest rate environment. Revenue in our U.S. concrete waste management services segment, operating under the EcoPan brand, increased 8% to $21.3 million compared to $19.8 million in the prior year quarter. This organic growth was driven by higher pan pickup volumes and continued pricing momentum, underscoring the durability of this business through the cycle. For our U.K. operations, operating under the Camford brand, revenue was $15.3 million compared to $17.1 million in the same year-ago quarter. The decline was primarily volume-driven, reflecting ongoing weakness in commercial construction activity amid elevated interest rates and economic uncertainty. Foreign exchange translation was a 220 basis point benefit to revenue in the quarter. Returning to our consolidated results, fourth quarter gross margin declined 170 basis points to 39.8% from 41.5% a year ago.

As we continue to focus on the elements of business that we can control, a strong emphasis on cost control initiatives and pricing discipline helped mitigate margin pressure from lower demand volumes. However, these benefits were slightly outweighed by lower volumes and reduced fleet utilization. General and administrative expenses in the fourth quarter were $26.5 million compared to $27 million in the prior year quarter. As a percentage of revenue, G&A was 24.4% in the fourth quarter compared to 24.2% in the prior year quarter, reflecting some operating deleverage on lower revenue rather than an increase in absolute spending. Net income available to common shareholders in the fourth quarter was $4.9 million or $0.09 per diluted share compared to $9 million or $0.16 per diluted share in the prior year quarter.

Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter was $30.7 million compared to $33.7 million in the same year-ago quarter. Adjusted EBITDA margin was 28.2% compared to 30.2% in the prior year quarter. The decline was primarily driven by lower revenue volumes, partially offset by ongoing cost initiatives across the organization. In our U.S. concrete pumping business, Adjusted EBITDA declined to $17.5 million compared to $19.7 million in the same year-ago quarter. In our U.K. business, Adjusted EBITDA was $4.1 million compared to $5.2 million in the same year-ago quarter. And for our U.S. concrete waste management services business, Adjusted EBITDA increased 3.8% to $9.1 million, reflecting robust operating leverage on higher volumes and pricing. Turning now to liquidity, at October 31, 2025, we had total debt outstanding of $425 million and net debt of $380.6 million, representing a net debt to Adjusted EBITDA leverage ratio of approximately 3.9 times.

We ended the quarter with approximately $360 million of available liquidity, including cash on hand and availability under our ABL facility, providing substantial financial flexibility. Now, moving on to our share buyback plan, during the fourth quarter, we repurchased approximately 274,000 shares for $1.8 million, or an average price of $6.73 per share. Since initiating this program in 2022, we have repurchased approximately 4.9 million shares for roughly $31.5 million, with $18.5 million remaining in the current authorization through December 2026. We continue to view repurchases as a flexible and opportunistic component of our capital allocation strategy that demonstrates our ongoing commitment to delivering enhanced shareholder value. Turning to our outlook for fiscal 2026, we expect revenue to range between $390-$410 million and adjusted EBITDA to range between $90-$100 million. Our guidance assumes no meaningful recovery in the construction markets during fiscal year 2026.

While overall manufacturing and commercial activity remains muted due to interest rate and tariff uncertainty, we continue to see healthy bidding activity and project starts in large-scale commercial projects such as data centers, semiconductor facilities, and distribution centers, where pricing remains constructive. In our infrastructure and residential end markets, we expect 2026 revenue to be roughly flat year-over-year. We expect free cash flow, which we define as Adjusted EBITDA, less net replacement CapEx, less net cash paid for interest, to be at least $40 million. The 2026 outlook assumes approximately $23 million of net replacement CapEx and $32 million of net cash paid for interest. This excludes the exceptional accelerated CapEx brought forward from 2027. As Bruce mentioned, we are incorporating accelerated fleet investment into our fiscal 2026 planning and long-term capital allocation framework.

In fiscal 2026, we expect to invest approximately $22 million that has been accelerated from our planned 2027 capital allocation investments. This represents a timing shift rather than a structural change to our long-term capital framework, with our fleet net replacement expected to be a low single-digit percentage of revenue in fiscal 2027. Our balance sheet and liquidity position is comfortable to support this fleet investment, and we remain committed to disciplined capital deployment, maintaining leverage within our target range, and prioritizing returns on invested capital. We believe we are well positioned to strengthen our service offering in anticipation of a market recovery. With that, I’ll now turn the call back to Bruce.

Thanks. Thanks, Iain. While end markets have yet to show signs of a sustained recovery, we believe the company is well positioned to benefit as construction activity ultimately improves. Over the last several quarters, we have preserved financial flexibility and generated strong cash flow, reinforcing the stability of our platform. Our focus remains in the areas within our control, executing against our disciplined growth strategy, maintaining our commercial leadership, driving efficiency through operational excellence, and strategically investing in our fleet as a source of significant competitive advantage. With our solid financial position, we have the flexibility to pursue acquisitions when opportunities arise, invest in organic growth initiatives, and deliver superior shareholder value. We continue to take a disciplined and opportunistic approach to M&A with a focus on value-added acquisitions that strengthen our core platform.

In November of 2025, we completed an acquisition in the Republic of Ireland that aligns us well with our strategy. While modest in size, the transaction adds complementary capabilities in a new international region with healthy long-term demand drivers. The durability of our business model, combined with a track record of successfully navigating cycles, gives us confidence in our ability to deliver healthy financial and operating results through a variety of environments. We believe this positions the company to create long-term shareholder value over time. With that, I’d now like to turn the call back over to the operator for Q&A. Vaughn?

Iain Humphries, CFO, Concrete Pumping Holdings: Thank you, sir. We will now be conducting a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press Star and the number one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press Star Two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the Star keys. And our first question comes from Tim Mulrooney with William Blair. Please proceed with your question.

Iain, Bruce, good afternoon.

Unidentified Speaker: Hey, good afternoon, Tim.

So, a couple of questions on the guide here. I know you’re expecting construction end markets to remain challenged this year, but it looks like you’re actually expecting revenue to be up modestly at the midpoint. So can you just talk about the drivers behind that? Is the year-over-year growth primarily from the acquisition, or are you expecting some organic growth as well?

Yeah, hi, Tim. This is Iain. I’ll take that. Yeah, it’s more so we’re expecting volume to be largely consistent year-over-year, but we do expect to see some pricing improvement. Some of that will come from the larger projects that we mentioned. But year-over-year, we expect the volume to be relatively flat year-over-year. So that’s where the incremental growth at the midpoint would come from.

Okay, that’s helpful. Thanks, Iain. And then sticking on the guide for a minute, it looks like you expect revenue to be up a little bit, but margins to contract. Correct me if I’m wrong on that math, but if I’m right, how should we think about the primary drivers of that margin pressure in 2026 in the context of that low single-digit top-line growth implied by the midpoint of your outlook? Is it just fleet utilization? Is there more that I should take into consideration there?

Yeah, no, I think you’re right. It’s mostly fleet utilization. I mean, obviously, as we scale volume, we get some nice incremental margin. But with the volume being flat, there’s a marginal decline in that margin percentage at the midpoint from that sort of lower-than-expected or optimal utilization.

Okay, got it. Very clear. And if I could just sneak one more in, if you permit me, I wanted to ask about your outlook for residential construction, which I know continues to be a challenge right now, but was a source of strength not all that long ago. So would you characterize this market right now, for you, for new home construction, as getting progressively softer in recent months or stabilizing or on a slow path to recovery? I ask because we’re getting all sorts of different signals and opinions from macro data points out there.

Bruce Young, CEO, Concrete Pumping Holdings: Yeah, thanks, Tim. I’ll take that, and I think I would look at that from the different regions. The regions where we do most of our residential, it was a little softer last year, but it’s starting to improve slightly, and we do expect that it should improve some during this year. We’re actually somewhat optimistic on residential.

Okay, understood. Thanks for taking my questions and good luck in 2026.

Unidentified Speaker: All right, thanks, Tim.

Iain Humphries, CFO, Concrete Pumping Holdings: Our next question comes from Brent Thielman with D.A. Davidson. You may proceed with your question.

Hey, thanks. Good evening, guys. Yeah, I wanted to maybe just follow up on the overall kind of growth outlook for 2026 as you sit here today and maybe just ask in a different way your high-level views and expectations for each of the business groups. I guess I’m thinking a little more towards the U.K. group and Eco-Pan. What’s sort of a good framework for us to think about for those two businesses with what you see in front of them?

Bruce Young, CEO, Concrete Pumping Holdings: Yeah, thanks, Brent. So taking them one at a time, so in the U.K., we have a really strong presence in the publicly funded work, especially HS2 and some of the energy projects that are going on. There’s some work around London that we are very well positioned for. So we expect the public spend to be really good and our revenue in the U.K. to be quite strong with that. Our opportunity that we have in Ireland is being run out of a U.K. operation. We see that as the commercial market in Ireland is good, the infrastructure market in Ireland is good. So we expect that small business that we bought there to improve throughout the year. And the real question mark for us in the U.K. is really the rebound of the commercial market. It appears that they’re maybe six months behind even the U.S.

Market on commercial work. And so that’s kind of our outlook there. EcoPan, as you know, we always expect double-digit growth. We think the construction market went backwards significantly last year, but EcoPan still had reasonable growth. We think with kind of the flatness in the market going forward this year that EcoPan should be back to high single digits, maybe double-digit growth. We feel pretty good about the outlook for them. And with our U.S. concrete pumping business, we just mentioned residential, we expect it to be somewhat resilient this year. Infrastructure has been a little bit better for us. The real question for us is in the commercial market.

As you know, we do a lot of work on data centers and chip plants and those sorts of things, which are really nice jobs for us that require large technical equipment, high volumes of concrete being placed often in remote areas. That’s a really nice fit for our business. That’s the upside, but the downside is there’s still no office buildings. Manufacturing, because of tariff concerns, really hasn’t come about like we would expect it to. Hopefully, the tariff discussions get settled out sometime this year and manufacturing starts coming back. But the commercial market’s kind of the question in the U.S. as well. Will the chip plants and data centers keep us going strong while we’re waiting for light commercial in some of these other markets and markets to come back for segments?

Really helpful, Bruce. Appreciate all that. Maybe just on EcoPan and getting to that high single, potentially low double-digit kind of growth, is that contingent on your ability to get into new markets, or can you get there in the existing sort of geographies that you’re operating in?

Yeah, good question. So we’re always moving into every year we move into a couple of new markets, but it takes a little while for them to develop. But again, the markets that we have moved into previously haven’t matured yet. And so there’s an awful lot of opportunity to create greater density in some of the current markets that we’re already in.

Got it. Maybe just the last question, the CapEx pull forward. Does this address all of your requirements associated with the upcoming regulations, or should we think there’s another big slug of CapEx in the next year or two?

No, this pulling it forward will address almost all of that issue. I don’t know if you remember back, but in 2008, the last time there was a major change in the emissions, for the concrete pumping industry, it literally took from 2008 to 2013 before they could come out with a reliable truck that they could put underneath a concrete pump and operate it. And now I realized during that time we had the GFC, and so there maybe wasn’t a lot of effort to put into that. But we are concerned about the disruption to giving us a truck that is reliable to service our customers the way we need. And that’s the reason we’re pulling that forward so we don’t get caught up in that as they’re trying to sort through getting us a reliable solution.

Okay, thanks very much. I’ll pass it on.

Unidentified Speaker: Thanks, Brent.

Iain Humphries, CFO, Concrete Pumping Holdings: Before we take our next question, as a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press Star One on your telephone keypad. You will hear a confirmation tone to indicate your line is in the question queue. Our next question comes from Andy Whitman with Baird. Please proceed with your question.

Unidentified Speaker: It’s nice to have a CEO that has been around long enough to learn from the 2008 truck crisis to avoid it in the past. So that’s a good thing. I guess just Eco-Pan margins, good revenue growth. You’ve been talking come through quite as much, Iain. Was that a comp issue or you had a mention that, like you said, that the pickups of the deliveries were a big driver? So I guess that’s probably a little lower margin. Is that what it is? Is that the bridge? Normally, I’d expect positive leverage out of the business here, but maybe you could address.

Bruce Young, CEO, Concrete Pumping Holdings: Yeah, it’s a little bit. I mean, as Bruce mentioned just in the last of his closing remarks, we did move into some new regions. So as you know, there was a little bit of overhead investment to stand up some of those new regions. So I mean, slight change in the EBITDA margin percentage, but the payback and the ROI is still really healthy. So yeah, we’re still very happy with the margin. But as you know, there’s a bit of an investment lag as we stand up some of those new markets that we entered into sort of late in 2025. Yeah.

Okay. And then I just thought I’d ask about fuel, actually. Crude prices are way down, but it doesn’t look like diesel has followed suit quite as much. I was hoping you could just address what the net impact was in fuel to the quarter and what you’re looking for, what’s kind of underwritten in your guidance. I know obviously there’s a range, so there’s a range in your fuel outcomes as well. But so are you thinking is that a headwind year-over-year in 2026, tailwind? I know that diesel prices in November were super low, actually, but they’ve kind of popped up a little bit more since then. So just maybe if you could address the topic as a whole would be helpful for us.

Yeah, sure. So I mean, obviously, we track that as well. And so year over year in the quarter, they were largely flat. They have come down, I mean, since back from like 2022, 2023, but it’s sort of been a bit uneven, I would say, over the last year or two. Our assumption is going forward that that will largely remain. So we don’t see it normally like a headwind or a benefit going into next year as we sit here currently. So yeah, that’s a quick look back and where we see things going forward.

Got it. And then just, Bruce, I know the Ireland investment’s not that significant, but it feels kind of like a bit of a change. I guess you’re not in Dublin. I know the whole country is kind of growing, but is this a one-off, or do you feel like now that you got at least some kind of a flag planted here that you need to build out the rest of the Republic? And maybe if you could just talk about any things that we should think about for modeling that one, Iain, that’d be just helpful. Cash outlay or how much revenue we should expect from it just so we can understand what it might contribute.

Yeah, well, thanks for the question, Andy. But certainly, we wouldn’t have gone into Cork just as a one-off. We see opportunity for several other opportunities for acquisitions in Ireland. And certainly not anything to talk about currently, but our plan is to take that and grow it.

Unidentified Speaker: Yeah, any comments? Is there anything you can say in the economics, or should we just wait for the filing?

Bruce Young, CEO, Concrete Pumping Holdings: Yeah, I mean, on the economics, I mean, in U.S. dollars, it’s largely $2 million of revenue and about $500,000 of EBITDA contribution. I mean, as Bruce says, I mean, obviously, there’s scaling there. I mean, one thing that we can do is there’s a common, they call it a common travel area between the U.K. and Ireland. So there is an ability to move labor back and forth as we sort of build out that landscape. I mean, as you move between Galway, Dublin, Limerick, down to Cork, there’s a really strong economy that’s back in some of that construction activity we’re seeing there.

Okay, last one for me. Sorry to keep going here, but we’ll just round them all up. Bruce, just kind of on the environment, I guess, for lack of a better term. At first, when interest rates were going up and things were kind of slowing down, there was talk about projects delayed timing, not cancellation. You still kind of had them on the roster for doing the job someday. Just wanted to check in on that. Has there been, in fact, now cancellations that you’re going to have to kind of re-win the jobs? Or what is kind of the status of some of the stuff that was at one time planned but has been kind of slow-moving now for a while? I’m just kind of curious as to what you kind of see there and kind of where your backlog stands today as a result of that.

Yeah. So the only two areas that I would say that we have that concern, any office buildings that were planned over the last few years, they’ve been shelved, and there’s no timeline when they may come back. Manufacturing, there’s a lot of that that is on hold, may start up depending on how the tariff conversations land. Many of those projects we already have, and if they go, we’ll be in line to do those projects. So we feel pretty good about that. But like we mentioned earlier, the offset is the chip plants and the data centers where we’re doing quite well on that. And as long as they can keep providing energy and water to those sites, we think that could be really good for us this year.

Okay. All right. That’s all I had. Thanks a lot.

All right. Thanks, Andy.

Iain Humphries, CFO, Concrete Pumping Holdings: At this time, this concludes our question and answer session. I would now like to turn the call back over to Mr. Young for closing remarks.

Bruce Young, CEO, Concrete Pumping Holdings: Thank you, Bon. We’d like to thank everyone for listening to today’s call, and we look forward to speaking with you when we report our first quarter results in March.

Iain Humphries, CFO, Concrete Pumping Holdings: Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today’s teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation and have a great day.