Analyst Ratings January 28, 2026

BMO Cuts Brown & Brown Price Target to $81, Keeps Market Perform Rating

Analyst trims EBITDA forecasts and flags lack of near-term catalyst as peers also pare targets after mixed Q4 results

By Leila Farooq BRO
BMO Cuts Brown & Brown Price Target to $81, Keeps Market Perform Rating
BRO

BMO Capital reduced its price target on Brown & Brown to $81 from $88 while retaining a Market Perform rating. The firm trimmed EBITDA estimates by about 3.0% and projects 2026 organic growth of roughly 2.4%, below consensus. Recent fourth-quarter results showed a slight EPS beat but revenue missed expectations. Other analysts have also dialed back targets amid revenue headwinds and growth concerns.

Key Points

  • BMO Capital cut its price target on Brown & Brown to $81 from $88 and kept a Market Perform rating, an approximately 8% reduction.
  • BMO lowered its EBITDA estimates by about 3.0% and now forecasts 2026 organic growth of ~2.4%, below the ~3.0% consensus.
  • Q4 2025 results showed an EPS beat of $0.93 versus $0.91 forecast (+2.2%), but revenue missed at $1.6 billion against an expected $1.65 billion.

BMO Capital has lowered its price target for Brown & Brown (NYSE: BRO) to $81.00 from $88.00, representing roughly an 8% reduction from its prior target, while leaving its Market Perform rating in place.

The analyst team, led by Michael Zaremski, adjusted its near-term financial outlook for the insurance brokerage after reworking underlying assumptions. BMO trimmed its EBITDA estimates for Brown & Brown by approximately 3.0% and now models organic growth of about 2.4% for 2026, a pace it says falls short of the consensus figure of roughly 3.0%.

Zaremski noted a mixed valuation picture for the stock. On a price-to-earnings basis, Brown & Brown appears historically discounted against the S&P 500, but that relative bargain is not echoed across enterprise value to EBITDA and free cash flow yield metrics, which do not show the same degree of discount versus the broader market.

On the question of near-term upside, BMO was explicit about its caution, saying it "does not currently see a positive catalyst that would get the stock to work in the very near term," signaling limited immediate upside potential under the firms current assumptions.


Recent company results provide context for the recalibrations. In its fourth quarter of 2025, Brown & Brown reported earnings per share of $0.93, topping the forecast of $0.91 by about 2.2%. Revenue, however, came in at $1.6 billion versus an expected $1.65 billion, leaving top-line performance below street estimates.

Longer-term shareholder returns remain a point of stability: Brown & Brown has sustained dividend distributions for 41 consecutive years and has increased its dividend for 33 straight years, a record cited in market data that underscores the companys history of returning cash to shareholders.

Other sell-side firms have also adjusted their outlooks. Mizuho lowered its price target to $84 from $90, citing revenue headwinds and trimming earnings projections for 2026 and 2027. Truist Securities reduced its target to $100 from $105 but maintained a Buy rating, while flagging concerns about growth and personnel losses at Howden, a business referenced by the firm.


Collectively, the revisions from BMO and peers reflect a cautious stance among analysts after mixed quarterly results and emerging headwinds to revenue and growth assumptions. For investors, the immediate takeaway is a more muted near-term expectation for share appreciation, balanced against a long history of dividend continuity.

Risks

  • Lack of near-term catalysts - BMO stated it currently does not see a positive catalyst to drive the stock in the very near term, implying limited upside for equity investors in the short run (affects equity markets and investor sentiment).
  • Revenue headwinds - Mizuho cited revenue pressures and lowered earnings estimates for 2026 and 2027, indicating potential top-line weakness that could pressure valuations and sector growth assumptions (impacts insurance and financial sectors).
  • Growth and personnel concerns - Truist highlighted growth worries and personnel losses at Howden, representing operational risks that may affect business performance and investor confidence (relevant to corporate governance and brokerage operations).

More from Analyst Ratings

Palantir Gains After Lofty 2026 Guidance; Analysts Split on Outlook Feb 2, 2026 Freedom Capital Markets Starts Coverage of Nebius Group With Buy Rating, $108 Target Feb 2, 2026 Clear Street Starts Coverage on Caribou Biosciences with Buy Rating and $13 Target Feb 2, 2026 Goldman Keeps OLN Neutral at $22 as Olin Signals Rough Q1, Cost Cuts to Cushion Results Feb 2, 2026 Aletheia Capital Starts Coverage on Teradyne With Buy Rating, $400 Target Feb 2, 2026