Analyst Ratings January 28, 2026

Barclays Begins Coverage of Bloom Energy, Assigns Equalweight Rating and $153 Target

Bank highlights fast deployment, cost trends and technology validation even as valuation appears to price in robust long-term deliveries

By Hana Yamamoto BE
Barclays Begins Coverage of Bloom Energy, Assigns Equalweight Rating and $153 Target
BE

Barclays has opened coverage on Bloom Energy (NYSE: BE) with an Equalweight rating and a $153 price objective. The bank cites the company’s rapid site commissioning, falling costs and average selling prices, and recent contract validations as demand drivers for its solid-oxide fuel cell technology, while warning that current market valuation already assumes aggressive future deployment.

Key Points

  • Barclays initiates coverage on Bloom Energy with an Equalweight rating and a $153 price target; stock trading at $152.31, near its 52-week high of $155.87, with earnings due Feb. 5 per InvestingPro.
  • Bank highlights Bloom’s faster-than-peer deployment (Oracle commitment to deliver power within 90 days), strong recent revenue growth of 44.53% year-over-year, and analyst forecasts of 27% revenue growth for fiscal 2025.
  • Costs and average selling prices are falling, narrowing the capex gap with gas engines and turbines; technology validation cited via AEP’s exercise of a 900 MW option and positioning for 800 VDC systems.

Barclays has initiated coverage of Bloom Energy Corp. (NYSE: BE) with an Equalweight rating and a price target set at $153.00. The announcement came while the stock was trading at $152.31, just below its 52-week high of $155.87. Bloom Energy is also due to report quarterly results in eight days, with earnings expected on February 5, according to InvestingPro data.

In its initiation note, Barclays emphasized several dynamics it expects will support demand for Bloom Energy’s solid-oxide fuel cell (SOFC) systems over the coming years. Among those dynamics is the company’s capacity to bring power facilities online more quickly than competitors. Barclays pointed to Bloom Energy’s commitment to Oracle to deliver operational power within 90 days as an example of accelerated deployment capability.

Bloom Energy’s recent top-line momentum was highlighted in the bank’s analysis. The company recorded 44.53% revenue growth over the last twelve months, and analysts are projecting roughly 27% additional revenue growth for fiscal year 2025.

Barclays also noted industry economics that are moving in Bloom Energy’s favor. Costs and average selling prices are declining, which the bank said narrows the capital expenditure gap between SOFC technology and alternative power solutions such as gas engines and gas turbines. That compression in the capex differential is a central part of Barclays’ positive demand thesis.

Technology validation through commercial agreements was another factor cited. Barclays specifically mentioned American Electric Power’s (AEP) decision to exercise a 900 MW option as evidence of the market validating Bloom Energy’s approach. The bank further identified the transition to 800 Volt Direct Current (VDC) systems as supportive for Bloom Energy, noting that the company’s OFC technology is well positioned given its inherent direct current power generation capabilities.

Despite these supportive elements, Barclays warned that the current share price appears to already incorporate much of the company’s growth narrative. The bank calculated that the stock implies Bloom Energy should approach roughly 5 gigawatts of deliveries by the end of the decade - a level that equates to approximately ten times the volumes projected for 2025 under consensus estimates.

Independent valuation metrics highlighted by InvestingPro were also referenced in the note, with InvestingPro analysis indicating an extremely high price-to-earnings ratio of 2320 and an EV/EBITDA multiple of 261.73. Those measures led InvestingPro to suggest the stock is significantly overvalued on current figures.

The initiation comes amid a string of recent analyst updates and corporate developments affecting the company’s outlook and market perception. Jefferies raised its price target for Bloom Energy to $92 from $53 while maintaining an Underperform rating, a move based on revised 2026 revenue estimates of $2.9 billion - roughly 16% above consensus - driven in part by orders from AEP and Quanta.

Clear Street raised its price target to $80 from $68 and kept a Hold rating, citing increased sales contribution tied to the American Electric Power order in Wyoming. Separately, Clear Street had previously increased its target to $68 from $58 after applying a 4.6x EV/Sales multiple to a 2027 revenue estimate of $3.7 billion.

RBC Capital reiterated an Outperform rating with a $143 price target following an air permit filing that signals Bloom Energy’s fuel cells will power a 1.5 GW datacenter project in Texas. In contrast, Jefferies retained an Underperform stance with a $53 target even after AEP’s $2.65 billion acquisition of Bloom Energy’s fuel cells for the Wyoming project.

Taken together, the analyst actions and project developments reflect active interest in Bloom Energy but also divergent views on valuation and near-term fundamentals. Barclays’ initiation frames the company as having meaningful operational and market tailwinds, while also pointing out that current market pricing appears to demand very sizable future scale-up in deliveries.


How this affects sectors:

  • Energy and power infrastructure - potential acceleration of SOFC adoption versus traditional gas-fired options.
  • Utilities and large energy buyers - implications for procurement strategies as fuel cell capex and deployment timelines evolve.
  • Industrial and datacenter buildouts - relevance for customers seeking fast, on-site low-emission power solutions.

Risks

  • Valuation risk - Barclays notes the current price implies Bloom Energy must reach about 5 GW of deliveries by decade-end, roughly 10x projected 2025 volumes, suggesting expectations are aggressive; impacts equity investors and energy sector valuations.
  • Execution and scaling uncertainty - achieving the rapid deployment and volume growth that valuation assumes will require sustained operational execution across manufacturing and project delivery; affects utilities and project developers.
  • Market expectation mismatch - independent metrics cited (InvestingPro P/E of 2320 and EV/EBITDA of 261.73) point to possible overvaluation, creating downside risk if revenue and margin trajectories fall short; influences investor sentiment in clean energy and infrastructure stocks.

More from Analyst Ratings

Palantir Gains After Lofty 2026 Guidance; Analysts Split on Outlook Feb 2, 2026 Freedom Capital Markets Starts Coverage of Nebius Group With Buy Rating, $108 Target Feb 2, 2026 Clear Street Starts Coverage on Caribou Biosciences with Buy Rating and $13 Target Feb 2, 2026 Goldman Keeps OLN Neutral at $22 as Olin Signals Rough Q1, Cost Cuts to Cushion Results Feb 2, 2026 Aletheia Capital Starts Coverage on Teradyne With Buy Rating, $400 Target Feb 2, 2026